My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 02/13/2003
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
2003
>
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 02/13/2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2025 9:51:08 AM
Creation date
7/8/2003 3:54:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Parks and Recreation Commission
Document Date
02/13/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Sketch Phm R. eview: The Village of Sunfish Lake <br />J~uary 31,2003 <br />Page 5 of 6 <br /> <br />I4. Tree Preservation. A t. ree preservation pian (Sheet LI-1) has been included-' as part of the <br /> prelimina.ry plat submittal. Tree preservation areas are-indicated' on' the PIan. The plan shcrws <br /> approximately 2.5 acres of trees being preserved' or 30% of the e~sting u-ce cover'.'An effort <br /> is being made to' preserve some of the significant trees on this property and wilt result in a <br /> reduction of the required landscape planting: as .al?Cussed above. 'In. addition to. the <br /> aforementioned, trees being preserved, there is also a small patch of oaks~ that will remain in <br /> the-northeast corner~ of tkis property. " .- <br /> Above and beyond' the trees that- are slated· for preservation, there is tremendous, potential' to. <br /> preserve a number of young red' and white oaks by relocating them with a tree spade-. On site <br /> inspections with City Scarf to identify possible candidates for'relocation should be given strong <br /> consideratJon. These trees could be used to satisfy the overStoD, plantings required for density <br /> transizionmg and could possibly' be used to offset the ornamental/understory plantings ~ well <br /> (depending on the total number that ~vbuld be transplanted). These would,, of course, need to be. . <br /> relocated to fire buffer strips along the eastern and' Southern boundaries. ' - -'. ' ' <br /> <br />15. Shoreland District: Portions of the proposed parcel to be developed are contained'in the <br /> Shoreland Overlay District. Sunfish Lake is classified as a Recreational Development Lake <br /> and land within 1000 feet of the Ordinary High water mark need to comply with the shoreland <br /> regulations. These regulations include a minimum of '15.,000 square feet for each. lot and a <br /> width of 75 feet at the building ILne. Under the adopted Shoretand Ordinances, a PUD that <br /> alters the minimum dimensional standards can be considered, but first need to be approved by <br /> the ~vfinnesota Department of Natural t~esources before the City approves the development. <br /> <br /> Tom Hovey of the DN-R has reviewed your plan and has indicated that the plan is generally <br /> acceptable. The DN-R has indicated that the density of units contained within the Skoreland <br /> Overlay District is a little more than they would typically like.to see, but ~ven thel. amoUnt of <br /> open space preserved as part of the development and the fact that there' will-be ['ess. <br /> stormwater runoff into Sunfish Lake than currently oCcUrs, the-DNK finds the Plan acceptable. <br /> <br />16. Environmental Issues: As tXis development is occurring within the Sh°reland Overlay <br /> District, City Code requires that .certain environmental review· occurs and criteria is met. The <br /> .majority of the review criteria regards .grading and fi~ling within the ShOretand area. This <br /> information is reviewed as part of the Lower Rum 1Liver Water Management permit process. <br /> The other main component of. the required-environmental review deals with the. protection of <br /> trees. The. City will, as in previous developments, best. management practices be used' during <br /> grading around trees. Also, you have submitted a. tree preservation plan 'that complies with <br /> the required review-regarding tree removal. · . : . <br /> <br />17. Sidewalks. In accordance with City Code, sidewalks are required on one Side of ali public <br /> non cul-de-sac streets.. If'the cottages are served by Private streets, the .submitted plans.. <br /> conform to the sidewalk ordinance. <br /> <br />18. Trail Development: At the City Council workshop: on january 21., 2003; the City Council- <br /> indicated that they would like to have the trail along the eastern edge of the plat· removed. <br /> Lei5 undecided was the status of the trail along the southern border of the development. Staff <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.