Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 03/13/2003

Home

" P~ve~ Pa~k Subdivis'ion .Sketch Plan Review 3~num7 30, 2003 2 of 3 · . Compatibility with the purposes and in~ents of ~he Zoni~.g'Chapter "and the 'C'i~'s' Comprehensiw ?lan~ ~ecifically residenzial dermity requirements.. Increases in 'density. may be allowed, provided'that tz-a~c .patrons 'will not be. adversely a~ec:c'd and 't2mt "pubLic.facilities are adequate. . ' ... : -- · · . .,- Provisions-for'a rn~{raum" of 20% Public' open space and/o~' 50% pri~.te Open 'space pr0teczed by adequate.covenants running with.the land or by conveyances or dedications. It"doesn't' appear, that. your plan for the property' meem the intent and criteria for-a ..especially the open space requiremenn. You have indicated .that .you do:not have any. intention of dedicating any permanent open space,.~ that you inroad to subdivide, the rest.of your property to .its ultimate density when sanir, azy sewer, and .municipal water are ~vailable .to the site.. The alternatives az this point would-be to request an amendment .to the ComprehenSive Plan to. provide for cluster developmenm .on communal septic systems 'or subdivide the property in accordance with the current 2.5 acre minimum lot szze. · Lot S'Lzcs: Thc mira{mum, lot size in the R~al Developing area is 2.5. acres. Your sketch plan proposes urban ~.ed lots at. a m{n{mum of 10,800 square feet .each.' AS ~tated above, to proceed - with the plan as proposed would requfi:e an amendment ~o the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning "- Ordinances az the proposal does not mee~ the intent and criteria of a'PUD. Density:' Net density-for th~ subject property has been' estal~his'hed at 1 unit per 2.5 acres; which permits the devel'opmem To develop 15 ldts on'the 37.1-acre parcel. The sketch develop 1 ~5 Iots,. which exceeds City Code requirements. .Lot Dimensions: The minimum lot width is 200· .feet in the Rural Developing area. In accordance with your proposal for a cIuster devetopmem of urban sized, lots in .anticipation of sanir, ary sewer and municipal, wate~ evenmally being e,'~ended proposed .80 ·foot lot'widths. Rum R.i.ver Scenic Overiny District:-The subject propen-y.is located with. in the Rum Privet - S~enic-District and subject to a 2.5 acre rni~im.um lot, size. The DNR will have ~o approve the proposed deviation from the 2'.5 acm [et snz~ requirement_ Drainage: A.draiuage. pl~ will .be reviewed as part of the prelimina~ plat submit-mi. " Ac=ess to Lot. s: Tkis development is pr0posmg access' from German/TM S. tree't N. V4.. 'The proposed su'eez pauem includes-two cul-de-sacs, with the terminal cul-de-sac proposed 'to' be temporary until the roadway is e,'ctended' westward. The proposed' mmporary, cul-de-sac is approximately ~595 feet in length, This .exceeds the 500 foot maxLmum cul-de-sac length established in City COde. The cul-de-sac length can mee~ City Code by reducing the number, o.f lots.. It shall be a rec[uiremem of the development to' reserve and construct accesses to the property lines of the plat. -8-