Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 03/13/2003

Home

· River ?ark Subdivision Sketch ?tan Review Janum-y 30, 2003 3 of 3 Utititie-~: You are proposing to-proVide a communal septic and' well system Tlxe 5sst step. requires, that you-to .provide moa/toting well and piezometdc wetlS to determine flow. and 'Wmer quality.. The City. w/ll req.uire ¢opie~ of sYstem design and .~oiI'borings for approval.'. The-des/ga · need~ to conform to Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. Chapter 70'80. 'You mm also. submit- an operation and. maintenance Schedule that identifies 'the frequency, of..monitr~ring; .The" respomibility for.operation and armua/reporting w/il lie with the homeowners association_. YOu- are proposing a standard gravity system where the' soft treats-the, effluent, i. To ut/H~e dripper limes during the summer months to' irrigal:e the tree farm. requ/ms a. pre~-t~eamaent, type systmm. You are proposing to conver~ the .lots ro mun/cipal water.and sanitary sewer when those serv/ces become available. This'will require submi'~m.l of'the size and grade of the.PrOposed sewer mad water lines "- for City'approVal. The association is also resp0nm'bfe .for the: maintenance o£the sewer and 5rater lines until the City utilities are.connecteck- " - ' ' ' ' Park Dedication: The City's park dedication fee is $1,800 per'unit. The City has the option.to' satisfy park' dedication requirements by cash, iand~ or a"combination· of cash.and land. The sketch pian will be forwarded to the February Park. an.d 'Recreation Commission for park dedication recommendation_ -'- Trail Fee: The City's 2003 trail' development :fee is. $475 per mt. Tlxe Park and Recreatior~ Commission will review the 'sketch plan .for trail development recommendations, at their February 'meeting. - · ' .'..- Storm-water Management Fee: The City has 'enactec[ a Storm~iater Management Fee at a rate .of $375.00 per unit. This fee must be paid'for the new lots. created'pr/or to release 0fthe fmal plat for recording. Tree Preserrvation and Landscaping: .At the time' of prelimin'ary plat review, the plan should .identify tree. removal limits and the location of'the-tree save fences. City Ordinances 'require .installation of two over~ory trees per-sing)e-family, lot. .The type of.trees shall corrform to the City plantings schedule '(art,ached) and' be comprised of at least 25% COniferous' amd 25% deciduous.. For each: existing si?~icant tree removed, one o'verstory..~:ree may be deducted, fi:om- the minim'urn, amber of tree that are to be added to the project, area. ' ' '.'. Density' Transitioning:. In accordance: with' Ci. ty. Code, some dens,rT, trans/tioning ~ould"be ' ' ' required between' the urban-sized Iots and' the larger rural lot to'the aorta and' the urban,s/zed lots and the Iarge~, rural', homestead to .the south. For urban lots adjacent m ruml'iots, 'City C~de" requires a. 45 foot w/de comdo'r in. common ownersh/p with. the association. Eight oversrory-- trees., 8 evergreen trees and 8 anderstory trees would lmve to be planted, f~r each 100'feet of' common property line with the rural lots. The lots on the north and south-lines of thePlat'would lxave co he increaseri in depth to accommodate the rec[uired4.5 foot corridor. -9-