My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
05/23/95
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Road and Bridge Committee
>
Agendas
>
1995
>
05/23/95
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2025 11:02:29 AM
Creation date
7/9/2003 11:27:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Document Title
Road and Bridge Committee
Document Date
05/23/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CASE <br /> <br /> TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEES <br />By: Steven Jankowski, City Engineer <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />At the April 25, 1995 Road and Bridge Committee meeting, a discussion of transportation impact <br />fees was discussed as a more equitable vehicle for generating funds necessary to construct collector <br />streets. Such collector streets will be required to handle traffic from newly developing areas. In <br />addition, improvements may be required to existing arterial roadways as a result of the need to <br />increase the capacity to handle additional traffic from the new developments. You will recall our <br />existing policy requires developers to participate in the construction of collector roadways when <br />they happen to be required through their particular subdivision. This leaves adjacent developments <br />which are lucky enough not to require collector streets directly through their territory to benefit <br />without payment. A survey of communities throughout the Metropolitan Area revealed that a <br />number of municipalities do collect fees uniformly from developments to generate funds for <br />collector street construction and arterial road improvements. You will recall that it was the <br />consensus of the Road and Bridge Committee to pursue development of such a modification to the <br />City of Ramsey's current funding mechanism. At the April 25th meeting, City Council concurred <br />and directed Staff to prepare the necessary documents for modifying our ordinances to adopt such <br />a transportation impact fee policy. <br /> <br />In order to facilitate the development of necessary policy and ordinance changes, Staff solicited <br />material from the Cities of Savage and Prior Lake. These materials are enclosed for your review. <br />At the present time in the City of Savage, single family home developers pay $1,400 per <br />developable acre, plus a $229 fee on each building permit. Non-single family homes developed <br />pay $3,054 per net developable acre. In Prior Lake, developers are charged $1,500 per <br />developable acre, plus a $400 fee on each building permit. In Maple Grove, a charge of $2,000 <br />per residential unit is assessed for future transportation costs. Interestingly enough, when the City <br />was considering establishing an impact fee for the area surrounding Sunwood Drive, an analysis <br />showed the proposed impact fee to be $1,666 per acre. From review of all of the above referenced <br />sources, it would appear there is a reasonable basis for establishing an impact fee within the above <br />price ranges. Enclosed for your consideration is a draft policy which states the rationale for the <br />impact fee and establishes the procedure for its collection. <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br /> <br />I am recommending that we establish a transportation trunk charge of $500 per residential lot <br />created on all new subdivisions and $1.50 per square foot of commercial building space. <br /> <br />It is estimated that the residential charge would have generated in the range of $900,000 over the <br />past five years if they had been in place. <br /> <br />It is my opinion that the amount can be justified as a reasonable amount consistent with the impact <br />cost of the development as is evident from our analysis of the proposed Sunwood Drive impact <br />fees. Since each residence generates the same number of trips regardless of parcel size, both rural <br />and urban development contribute to the impact equally. In addition, if this is to be a true impact <br />fee, an equitable charge should be established for commercial land use. Traffic generation <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.