My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
05/23/95
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Road and Bridge Committee
>
Agendas
>
1995
>
05/23/95
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2025 11:02:29 AM
Creation date
7/9/2003 11:27:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Document Title
Road and Bridge Committee
Document Date
05/23/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STATUS <br /> <br />CASE # 4 <br /> <br />REPORT ON TRUNK HIGHWAY #47 CORRIDOR STUDY <br /> By: Steve Jankowski, City Engineer <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />You will recall that at the April 27, 1995 Road and Bridge Committee meeting, I presented a draft <br />copy of the scope of services which ! had prepared to define the scope of study. I have <br />subsequently sent a copy of this scope of study to Mn/DOT, Anoka County Highway Department <br />and Metropolitan Council for comment. I feel it is important to solicit input from these <br />organizations before proceeding with the process of interviewing and selecting a consultant to <br />perform the study. <br /> <br />To date, I have been contacted by Mr. Cyrus Knutson of Mn/DOT who has advised me that the <br />department is rethinking its organizational goals in terms of its new policy focus of "preserve, <br />manage, and expand" the existing system, and has essentially placed a moratorium on corridor <br />studies until 1996. I emphasized to Mr. Knutson that this study was of great importance to the <br />City of Ramsey and that it was imperative that some action be initiated immediately. He agreed to <br />reconsider and discuss internally Mn/DOT's participation level. He indicated that he would attempt <br />to advise by meeting time. I have not received any comments from Anoka County Highway <br />Department or Metropolitan Council. <br /> <br />I am enclosing a revised draft of the current scope of services. I would like to direct attention to <br />the section entitled "Plan Development Process and Agency Involvement". It will be necessary to <br />have Mn/DOT, Anoka County Highway Department, and Metropolitan Council work directly with <br />the consultant during the study process. The level of involvement with the Council, Planning <br />Commission, Economic Development Commission, and local citizens is an issue which offers a <br />greater variability. At one extreme, this study could be viewed as a largely technical exercise with <br />minimal need for involvement of these parties. This seemed to be the direction of the Road and <br />Bridge Committee at the April 27, 1995 meeting. Although I concur with the desirability of this <br />approach, transportation issues seldom are strictly technical. In order to achieve some balance <br />between technical and policy aspects, I believe it is necessary to have some interim study reports. I <br />also believe this plan should be considered a part of the Comprehensive Plan and should receive a <br />public hearing prior to final adoption. <br /> <br />Committee Action: <br /> <br />Based upon discussion. <br /> <br />Reviewed by: Copies also distributed to: <br />City Engineer City Administrator <br />RB :05/23/95 <br /> <br />/ccr <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.