Laserfiche WebLink
COMMISSION BUSINESS/PUBLIC HEARING <br /> <br />Case #1: <br /> <br />Request for Amendment to Development Plan and Site Plan <br />Approval to Construct a Maintenance Building at the Rum <br />River Hills Golf Course; Case of Rum River Hills, Inc. <br /> <br />Chairperson Bawden closed the regular portion of the special Planning Commission <br />meeting at 7:32 p.m., in order to conduct the public hearing. <br /> <br />Public Hearin~ <br /> <br />Chairperson Bawden called the public hearing to order at 7:32 p.m. <br /> <br />Presentation <br /> <br />Zoning Administrator Frolik stated that Rum River Hills, Inc. submitted an application for <br />site plan approval to construct a 3,780 square foot maintenance building in the southwest <br />corner of the Rum River Hills Golf Course property. The Planning Commission tabled <br />action on this issue at their June 6, 1995 meeting to schedule a public hearing to consider <br />reviewing and amending the PUD development plan to specifically allow for the <br />establishment of a maintenance building on Ouflot G of the Rum River Hills PUD. <br /> <br />Citizen Input <br /> <br />George Steiner, 16460 St. Francis Boulevard N.W., Ramsey, stated he has lived at his <br />property for 31 years and has watched Ramsey's growth. He expressed concern about the <br />fairness to the property owners around the golf course if this building is erected. He <br />suggested if a maintenance building is needed, it should be built somewhere else. He <br />reported that the golf course came in after the land owners and this is a change from the <br />original plans. He agreed that the maintenance equipment does have to cross Highway #47 <br />now, but felt that if a building is needed at the site, it should be located farther away from <br />the property owners. He added that the property owners will suffer for the convenience of <br />a golf course and requested that other alternatives be explored. <br /> <br />Gerry Schmidt, 5831 - 164th Lane N.W., Ramsey, stated he owns the property directly <br />south of the proposed site plan. He stated he can not support a building in this area. This <br />area is zoned for recreation and open space and that when he purchased his home, this <br />wasn't in the plan. He felt this building would be in total contradiction and it takes away <br />from the aesthetics of his property. This building would not be compatible because of the <br />noise, hours of operation, maintenance vehicles, etc. He added that this building is twice <br />as big as his home and also much taller; it will be overpowering. Trees and berm will not <br />cover this. He added that the building is proposed to be only 100 feet from his deck and <br />after eight years of wide open view, the purpose for buying his home is being crushed. <br />This will detract from the beauty of the golf course and he felt that would also hurt the <br />course. He suggested that an "eye sore" should never be put in the front line. This <br />building will deteriorate the value of the homes on the course and the surrounding area. <br />Mr. Schmidt commented on the statement about the screening being adequate to screen the <br />building. He suggested it's not adequate screening for a building this size and also the <br />noise and activity will not be screened. He stated that if this building goes up as proposed, <br />it will take away his choice of removing more trees from his yard to further blend in with <br />the golf course. Mr. Schmidt continued that he has been clearing trees and has gotten up to <br />a point where there is a barbed wire fence and also a lot of debris from the golf course. He <br />reported that the debris is littering his lot line. He voiced concern with Jeff Toilette from <br />Rum River Hills Golf Course about the debris, etc. and also informed Mr. Tollette what he <br /> <br />Planning Commission/June 21, 1995 <br /> Page 2 of 10 <br /> <br /> <br />