Laserfiche WebLink
have not had discussions with that property yet, but maybe they would prefer this alternate <br />route//4 "jog" over to the east and then follow alternate 4/3 down C.R.//116 to the railroad <br />tracks. That little jog would not be a specific part of #3 or 4, but he asked that it be <br />considered so if the property owners would prefer that, it would be approved. <br /> <br />Mayor Hardin inquired of Mr. Voss if their meeting scheduled with Anoka Electric <br />Cooperative and UPA, etc. is an open meeting so Mr. Fountain or others could attend. <br /> <br />Mr. Voss stated it would be a very informal, very preliminary type meeting; therefore, he <br />felt maybe no one else would wish to attend it. <br /> <br />Mayor Hardin stated the City would like assurances that Anoka Municipal Utility is <br />planning to meet with Anoka Electric regarding the pole use. <br /> <br />Mr. Gedde assured Mayor Hardin that the City of Anoka will grant Anoka Electric <br />Cooperative the right to use our poles; however, we cannot assure the City that Anoka <br />Electric Cooperative will do the same. <br /> <br />Mr. Fountain again inquired why the lines cannot be placed on the same poles. <br /> <br />Mr. Gedde replied that the line Anoka Municipal is talking about is a transmission line; <br />what's there is a distribution line. <br /> <br />Mr. Fountain inquired if there's a reason why it cannot be strung right where it's situated. <br /> <br />Mr. Gedde stated if that were the case, we would need an 80-foot easement. <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman inquired if a public hearing was originally held on this issue. <br /> <br />Mr. Jankowski replied no, it was discussed at the Planning Commission and again at <br />Council last November. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Peterson and seconded by Councilmember Beyer to approve the <br />addition of Alternative 4 as an acceptable transmission line route with the changes indicated <br />by Mr. Gedde, have Mr. Jankowski attend the meeting of the utility companies, and <br />authorize the City Attorney to modify the agreement accordingly. <br /> <br />Further discussion: Councilmember Zimmerman inquired if the utility companies were <br />going to meet with Doug Fountain. Mr. Fountain felt it was not necessary as he had <br />conveyed his thoughts here. <br /> <br />Motion carded. Voting Yes: Mayor Hardin, Councilmembers Peterson, Beyer, Beahen <br />and Zimmerman. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Case #5: Adopt Ordinance Vacating Drainage and Utility Easements <br /> Along the Borders of Lot 2, Block 2, and Outlot C, of Rum <br /> River Hills Addition <br /> <br />City Administrator Schroeder asked that this case be tabled to ensure the City has received <br />all the easements. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Zimmerman and seconded by Councilmember Beyer to table <br />adoption of this proposed ordinance until a later date. <br /> <br />City Council/March 14, 1995 <br /> Page 13 of 15 <br /> <br /> <br />