Laserfiche WebLink
June 15, 1995 <br /> <br />To: <br />From: <br />Re: <br /> <br />Snowmobile Committee <br />Mike Auspos <br />Comments On Snowmobiles In Ramsey <br /> <br /> I have attached statistics on snowmobile complaints received <br /> by this department starting with the 1991 season (we used 9-1-91 <br /> as a start date for the seasons) through the end of the 1994-1995 <br /> season. I have not analyzed the data to determine the actual <br /> content of each complaint nor have I determined the number of <br /> repeat complaints (same complainant). I would stress that these <br /> are statistics only and without a thorough, and quite time <br /> consuming, process of examination of each event one can not draw <br />'too many conclusions from them. That is, there are many factors <br /> that can cause one year's complaints to differ from a previous <br /> year(s). Snow cover, temperature extremes, economy are three. A <br /> growth in population and concurrent increase in number of <br /> complaints about snowmobiles does not mean the two are connected, <br /> necessarily. It could mean that there were excellent snow <br />conditons and people were making money that season. I would <br />suspect however, that as our population increases, particularly <br />with urban lots, we will see an increase in the complaints. <br /> For the past two seasons we have had the use of a police <br />marked snowmobile for enforcement efforts and have been able to <br />get out to a very limited degree due to manpower and weather <br />conditions. Not only do warm days play havoc with patrolling <br />with the machine but on snowy days, particulary when there is a <br />heavy snowfall, our patrol has more priority duties on the <br />highways in patrol cars. Unfortunately, this is also when the <br />machines come out in force. <br /> We have advertised our enforcement efforts and the ordinance <br />about to the limit of practicality. We have no way of knowing <br />the effectiveness of this information effort but at least the <br />public can not say it has not been informed. Judging from the <br />amount of tracks in open field areas, quite a few operators have <br />completely ignored the prohibitions against riding on private <br />property without permission. This has been particularly true in <br />the case of fields belonging to A1 Pearson, since much of his <br />affected land lies along highway 10 and/or adjacent to housing <br />areas. Many of the other open areas are fallow land or just land <br />awaiting development and we get no complaints from the owners. <br /> I suspect that the largest number of complaints come from <br />persons who call about operation either on the "boulevard" area <br />adjacent to the streets or to lawns/property close to these <br />boulevards. Noise is usually not a factor in complaints, unless <br />it is a late night/early morning incident. Speeding up and down <br />the streets is also somewhat common and is largely more a <br />perception of speed than actually violating the posted speed <br />limit or, in some cases, just an irritation to some citizens. <br /> One suggestion that I will present in this memo (I will <br />probably have others at the meeting) is that the committee or at <br />least a subcommittee join together and tour the city in <br />areas where snowmobiles are problematic and actually examine <br /> <br /> <br />