Laserfiche WebLink
Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Bawden, Commissioners Deemer, Holland, <br />Hendriksen, LaDue, Terry, and Thorud. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />It was the consensus of the Commissioner that #16 through g'25 would remain as presented. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Deemer and seconded by Commissioner Hendriksen to amend #26 <br />through #35 in the affn'mative. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Bawden, Commissioners Deemer, Hendriksen, <br />Holland, LaDue, Terry, and Thomd. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Deemer and seconded by Commissioner Thorud to recommend that City <br />Council adopt the amended Findings of Fact relating to Kaltec's request for a temporary <br />conditional use permit. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Bawden, Commissioners Deemer, Thorud, <br />Hendriksen, Holland, LaDue, and Terry. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />The Planning and Zoning Commission proceeded to review the terms of the CUP. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hendriksen commented that it was good to get some benefit out of the landfill, but <br />he was concerned about the pole barn being left standing afterwards and wanted it specifically <br />stated in the conditional use permit that it will be removed. <br /> <br />Ms. Frolik stated removal of all structures, etc. was addressed under "Term" of the CUP. <br /> <br />Commissioner Deemer inquired about the exterior of the building, and Mr. Rippe advised the <br />building would be wooden with a painted metal roof with skylights. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Deemer and seconded by Commissioner Holland to recommend that City <br />Council approve Kaltec of Minnesota, Inc.'s application for a temporary conditional use permit and <br />declare terms of same. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Bawden, Commissioners Deemer, Holland, <br />Hendriksen, LaDue, Terry, and Thorud. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Case #4: <br /> <br />Request for a Conditional Use Permit for an Accessory Apartment in <br />the R-I Rural Residential District; Case of Cathy Gustafson <br /> <br />Zoning Administrator Frolik advised that Cathy Gustafson has applied for a conditional use permit <br />to maintain an accessory apartment in her home at 15823 Nowthen Boulevard N.W. She stated <br />that the main living quarters were constructed in 1963 and an addition was put on the home in <br />1974. Ms. Frolik explained that the addition is separated from the main living quarters by an <br />atrium door and consists of kitchen, living room, bedroom, and bathroom, and is serviced by its <br />own furnace, water heater and gas meter. Ms. Frolik informed that Ms. Gustafson disagrees with <br />the need for a CUP because both units are occupied by family, neither unit is income producing, <br />both units are served by the same septic system and well, and the accessory unit has been used as <br />such since its construction in the 1970s and she continued that use when she took ownership in <br />1991. <br /> <br />The Planning and Zoning Commission proceeded to review the Findings of Fact. <br /> <br />It was the consensus of the Commission that #1 through #14 would remain as presented. <br /> <br />Planning & Zoning Commission/February 1, 1994 <br /> Page 4 of 9 <br /> <br /> <br />