03/17/94 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Board Member Thorud suggested, with reference to #6, combining the properties as all one lot to alleviate the zero side yard setback. Ms. Frolik stated that this facility would be sold as one business. Mr. Dubats ~greed that the idea of selling this property as a separate lot is not an issue, but stated it would be difficult to combine the lots as he has separate mortgages on each lot. He stated he would like a perpetual easement. Ms. Frolik noted that the 1986 variance to the impervious surface area requirement for Lot 2, referenced in Finding #10, was never certified by the Department of Natural Resources (DNR). Mr. Dubats noted that this area is served by a municipal storm system. Chairperson Deemer stated that Lot 1 is more than 1000 feet from the river, so it is not in the Critical River Overlay District, but Zoning Administrator Frolik stated she would have to verify that on the overlay maps. Board Member Hendriksen inquired if the variance had to be approved by the DNR. Ms. Frolik explained that once the Board make its decision, the DNR either certifies or disapproves it. Motion by Board Member LaDue and seconded by Board Member Holland to accept #1 through #8 as presented. Motion carded. Voting Yes: Chairperson Deemer, Board Members LaDue, Holland, Hendriksen, Terry, and Thomd. Voting No: None. Absent: Board Member Bawden. Board Member Hendriksen estimated that the unimpeded run-off from a 30% impervious surface area coverage would be approximately 1.3 cfs. Mr. Dubats stated he could restrict the unimpeded run-off to what 30% impervious surface area coverage would do. Motion by Board Member Hendriksen and seconded by Board Member Holland to amend g9 to read "That the Subject Property is not visible from the Mississippi River and the Applicant has proposed a drainage plan that provides for a detention volume consisting of a trench lined with block that will limit the surface water discharged from the Subject Property into the existing storm water system to 1.7 cfs; the Applicant has stated that he will further restrict the surface water discharged from the Subject Property into the existing storm water system to that which would normally be expected if the property was developed with 30% impervious surface area." Amendment by Board Member Terry and seconded by Board Member Holland to replace all references to "trench lined with block" in the findings with "water retention and sedimentation system." Amendment carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Deemer, Board Members Terry, Holland, Hendriksen, LaDue, and Thorud. Voting No: None. Absent: Board Member Bawden. Motion carded. Voting Yes: Chairperson Deemer, Board Members Hendriksen, Holland, LaDue, Terry, and Thomd. Voting No: None. Absent: Board Member Bawden. Board of Adjustment/March 17, 1994 Page 7 of 12