Laserfiche WebLink
Motion by Board Member Thorud and seconded by Board Member Holland to adopt Resolution <br />g94-03-052 approving the issuance of a variance to Ben Deemer at 14501 Sunfish Lake Boulevard <br />N.W. and deClaring terms of same, as amended. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Vice Chairperson LaDue, Board Members Thorud, Holland, <br />Hendriksen, and Terry. Voting No: None. Abstain: Chairperson Deemer. Absent: Board <br />Member Bawden. <br /> <br />Chairperson Deemer resumed his seat on the Board of Adjustment. <br /> <br />Case #3: <br /> <br />Request for a Variance from Side Yard Setback Requirements and <br />Impervious Surface Area Restrictions; Case of Bill Dubats, Lakeview <br />Enterprises, Inc. <br /> <br />Zoning Administrator Frolik stated that Bill Dubats of Lakeview Enterprises, Inc. has applied for <br />site plan approval to construct self-service storage facilities on Lot 3, Block 3, Riverside West. <br />She explained that the subject property is in the Critical River Overlay District which restricts the <br />impervious surface area to 30% of the lot area, however, Mr. Dubats is requesting a variance as his <br />site plan reflects an impervious surface area of 88%. Ms. Frolik added that the property is zoned <br />B-3 Highway Business which requires a 10 foot side yard setback, and Mr. Dubats is requesting a <br />variance to this setback as he proposes to develop the site with a zero lot line configuration along <br />the north sideyard. Ms. Frolik explained that this development would be an expansion of the self- <br />service storage facilities existing on Lots 1 and 2 of Riverside West. She noted that a variance to <br />the setback requirements was granted in 1987 in order that the storage facilities to be developed on <br />Lot 1 could be placed with a spacing consistent with the structures already constructed on LOt 2. <br />Likewise, Mr. Dubats is proposing to continue the spacing consistency between structures <br />established on Lots 1 and 2, requiring a variance to the side yard setback along the north property <br />line of Lot 3. <br /> <br />Chairperson Deemer stated the purpose of the Critical River Overlay District was to ensure no <br />commercial activity within 1000 feet of the river, but that Riverside West was already in <br />preliminary plat stage and negotiations were made to accommodate that. Therefore, Chairperson <br />Deemer felt that Mr. Dubats' property should be out of the Critical River Overlay District. <br /> <br />Ms. Frolik stated that Mr. Dubats' property is not outside the Critical River Overlay District. <br /> <br />Mr. Dubats stated that the property is zoned B-3 Highway Business. <br /> <br />Ms. Frolik noted that the Critical River Ordinance was adopted in 1985, and the subject property <br />was zoned then. <br /> <br />The Board inquired when Mr. Dubats purchased the property, and Mr. Dubats stated the purchase <br />agreement was dated January 29, 1994 with a contingency that this variance be approved. <br /> <br />Chairperson Deemer again stated that, as a Planning Commissioner who was involved in <br />implementing the Critical Area Designation Executive Order, he believes something was negotiated <br />when submitting the Critical River Overlay District with this property being zoned Business. <br /> <br />The Board inquired of other possible uses for this property, and Ms. Frolik stated that perhaps a <br />small business could put up a building with a small parking lot. <br /> <br />The Board of Adjustment proceeded to review the Findings of Fact. <br /> <br />Board of Adjustment/March 17, 1994 <br /> Page 6 of 12 <br /> <br /> <br />