Laserfiche WebLink
10. <br /> <br />11. <br /> <br />~ Loading docks are not applicable in this case but the intent of Code <br />regulations is that the activity at the docks and the overhead doors not be openly visible <br />from the public right of way. The overhead doors of the self storage facilfies are designed <br />to face north and south versus east towards Ebony Street. <br /> <br />Access to Facility_: Serf storage facilities currently exist on Lots 1 and 2 and were <br />develOped by the same developer. The development of storage facilities on LOt 3 is <br />intended to be an extension of the facilities on Lots 1 and 2. Access to the storage facilities <br />on Lot 3 will be provided via the existing enwance on LOt 1. <br /> <br />Design of Off-Street Parldne and Driveways: City Code requires that these areas be <br />surfaceA with concrete or asphalt and that the perimeter of the pavement be finished with 6 <br />inch continuous concrete curb. The site plan proposes bituminous surfacing of all <br />maneuvering areas. Curbing has not been proposed along the north and south property <br />lines. It is certainly logical that the curbing on the north property line be waived as it would <br />prohibit access to the facilities from Lots 1 and 2. The site plan should be modified to <br />provide curbing along the south property line. Be advised that the B-3 zoning regulations <br />state that all existing facilities need to be brought up to surfacing and curbing standards by <br />January 1, 1997. Given that, the developer may find it more economical to plan for the <br />curbing of Lots 1 and 2 in conjunction with improvements to Lot 3 rather than waiting until <br />1997. <br /> <br />Utilities: The site is located within the MUSA. The proposed facility has no water usage <br />and sewer and water services are currently not available to the site. <br /> <br />I.,~dscaping Screening: MLnimum 20 foot landscape buffers arc required along streets and <br />where.the property is adjacent to a residential use. Therefore, landscaped areas in this case <br />would be required along the east, south and west property lines. The developer is <br />proposing no landscape area long Ebony Street, the east property line. It is City staff's <br />opinion that a landscape area along Ebony Street can be appropriately waived in lieu of the <br />intense commercial activity generated across the street at SuperbowI. <br /> <br />Thc developer has proposed a 15 foot landscape area along the south side adjacent to a <br />residential use. It is City Staff's opinion that a 15 foot landscape area with evergreen trees <br />for screening purposes is a sufficient buffer, especially since the homeowner has indicated <br />satisfaction with thc proposal. It appears from thc site plan that 4 trees arc proposed for <br />this area. Four evergreens over a 150 foot span is quite sparce and the number of trees <br />proposed here should be increased. Brace Bacon, thc City's Environmental Specialist, has <br />recommended planting a minimum of 1 inch diameter trees a maximum of ten feet apart in a <br />triangular formation. At least two out of every three trees should be Spruce or Pine to <br />provide year around screening. Suggested species for the remaining trees are Red Oak, <br />White Oak, Burr Oak, Hackberry or Maple. PerhapS.some consideration could also be <br />given to establishing a species of vine in the fence for additional screening purposes. <br />Thc developer has not proposed a 20 foot landscape area.nor screening plantings along the <br />west property line. There is a park trail corridor that runs parallel with the west property <br />linc and separates the subject property from the adjacent park lot and residential lot. The <br />The City would be amenable to allowing the planting of the required tree screening within <br />the trail corridor. <br /> <br /> <br />