Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Schroeder stated that the TIF portion is very similar to that of the last case discussed. <br />It is proposed that the City receive a loan from the developer in the amount of SI/square <br />foot of construction pet' year, over seven years, toward reimbursement of infrastructure and <br />site work. The loan repayment would be over the term 1996 through the year 2002 upon <br />receipt of all taxes, fees and charges of the City from the developer. At the level of 45,640 <br />square feet completed in 1995, City revenues would exceed costs on this project in 1999. <br />Mr. Schroeder exphtined that if the project builds out slower than a single phase, revenues <br />and expenses would both be reduced. The break-even point may change slightly as well. <br />He noted that the first annual reimbursement (1996) will exceed annual projected revenue in <br />that year. All su[~sequent years will have the opposite result. He stated that the <br />development agreement is worded as such. The agreement is also drafted such that the <br />developer has a 1o~ o1' incentive to build out as much as he can; it's a pay as you go <br />increment. Staff is proposing that the first reimbursement for site and infrastructure will be <br />in 1996. The fi'om end o1' the project cost needs to be kept down so rent to the tenants will <br />be kept low. <br /> <br />Motion by Councihnember Peterson and seconded by Mayor Gilbertson to recommend <br />approval of the proposed site phm for Dennis Sharp & Associates for Lot 1, Block 1, <br />Ramsey 67 Industrial Park, contingent upon compliance with the City Staff review letter <br />and entering inlo a Development Permit agreement with the City as approved by the City <br />Attorney. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gilbertson, Councilmembers Peterson, Beyer and <br />Zimmemmn. Voting No: None. Abstain: Councilmemlx:rHardin. <br /> <br />Case #14: Relmrl from Finance Committee <br /> <br />Finance Officer 1-1art summarized the cases discussed at the Finance Comn'fittee. The 1995 <br />budget process update ,,,,,its given. The Finance Committee chose the dates of Monday <br />August 8, 1994, and Monday August 15, 1994, beginning at 5:30 p.m., to review the <br />1995 budget requests. <br /> <br />Consensus ot' the Council was thttt these would be the dates for the session. <br /> <br />The second case discussed by the Finance Committee was the contract with the Greater <br />Anoka County I-lt~m~me Society for Animal Control Services. It was determined that this <br />was basically the only rot,re to go for animal control and the Finance Committee <br />recommended approval. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilnaember Hardin and seconded by Mayor Gilbertson to approve the <br />1994-1995 Animal Corttrol Services contract with GACHS and authorize the City <br />Administrator ~o sign lite (.:ontract. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gilbertson, Counciln~embers Hardin, Beyer, Peterson <br />and Zimmem-mn. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />The Finance Commillee also discussed the 1995 Legal Services and recommended that the <br />City shoukl enter inlo :t contract with Randall, Dehn and Goodrich. <br /> <br />Motion by Councihnember Peterson and seconded by Councilmember Beyer to authorize <br />the City Administrator to enter into a contract for general legal and prosecution services for <br />1995, 1996 and 1997 with the firm of Randall, Dehn and Goodrich. <br /> <br />City Council/July 26, 1994 <br /> Page 25 of 27 <br /> <br /> <br />