Laserfiche WebLink
Motion by Councilmember Hardin and seconded by Councilmember Zimmerman to adopt <br />Resolution #94-12-263 adopting the 1995 Economic Development Authority Operating <br />Budget. <br /> <br />Motion carded. Voting Yes: Mayor Gilbertson, Councilmembers Hardin, Zimmerman, <br />Beyer and Peterson. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Case 06: Adopt 1995 Tax Levy and General Fund Operating Budget <br /> <br />Finance Officer Hart stated that the information distributed at the 1995 Truth-in-Taxation <br />public hearing, held on Wednesday, November 30, 1994, included information regarding <br />the tax capacity rate and tax dollar levies, at the maximum, as had been certified in <br />September 1994, and at the level proposed in the balanced Proposed 1995 General Fund <br />Budget. An additional $33,453 could be programmed into the General Fund Budget if the <br />Council's desire is to adopt the maximum levy. Ms. Hart stated that the 1995 Proposed <br />General Fund Budget, as it has been presented and reviewed in the past several months, is <br />based on the collection of tax dollars at a level that is $33,453 less than the maximum <br />certified, and results in a 19.4183 percent tax capacity rate. This equates to a 3.93 percent <br />increase in the taxes of a parcel with no value increase. This budget was balanced through <br />Staff recommended adjustments and resulted in a contingency in the amount of $31,399, <br />which is $18,601 lower than the $50,000 that has been the desired level the past few years. <br />Ms. Hart explained that if the Council wishes to adopt the tax levy a level higher than what <br />is included in the balanced budget, there would be an increase in the taxes of a $100,000 <br />homesteaded residential property (with no value increase) of $2.11 for every $10,000 <br />increase in the levy amount. Ms. Hart recommended adoption of the 1995 property tax <br />levy and Oeneral Fund Budget based on one of the following options: 1) Adopt the 1995 <br />property tax levy at $1,181,590 ($1,156,659 for general operation and $24,931 for debt <br />service) which results in a tax capacity rate of 19.4183 and an increase in the City's share <br />of taxes of approximately 3.93 percent. This option is what was presented in the Proposed <br />General Fund Budget and results in a contingency of $31,399; or 2) Adopt the 1995 <br />property tax levy at $1,195,191 ($1,170,260 for general operations and $24,931 for debt <br />service) which results in a tax capacity rate of 19.6418 and an increase in the City's share <br />of taxes of approximately 5.13 percent. This option increases the contingency amount to <br />$45,000, which is comparable to past levels; or 3) Adopt the 1995 property tax levy at <br />$1,215,043 ($1,190,112 for general operations and $24,931 for debt service) which <br />results in a tax capacity rate of 19.968 and an increase in the City's share of taxes of <br />approximately 6.87 percent. This option utilizes the maximum levy as certified in <br />September and results in a contingency of $64,852. <br /> <br />Mayor Gilbertson stated that we are holding things at a common sense level. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hardin stated that Staff brought a balanced budget based on Scenario #1 - <br />3.93 percent. This includes the police officer, snow plow track and computer. Nothing <br />vital was cut from the budget. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Hardin and seconded by Mayor Gilbertson to adopt Resolution <br />g94-12-264 based on Scenario #1 - 3.93 percent increase. <br /> <br />Further discussion: Councilmember Hardin stated we have covered all bases. He didn't <br />know why the budget would have to be any higher than that. <br /> <br />Motion failed. Voting Yes: Mayor Gilbertson and Councilmember Hardin. Voting No: <br />Councilmembers Beyer, Peterson and Zimmerman. <br /> <br />City <br /> <br />Council/December 13, 1994 <br /> Page 9 of 19 <br /> <br /> <br />