Laserfiche WebLink
Traffic Counts: A 24 hour traffic count shows 1319 vehicles per day on Waco Street, west of the <br />intersection. This amount of traffic is above residential street volumes, and approaches minor <br />collector street levels. The predominant movement through this intersection is the left <br />(northbound) and right (southbound) turn movements continuing on Waco .S,.,g'eet. The addition <br />of a stop sign on the northeast leg would require 500 to 600 stops each day for traffic, which <br />presently has a free right turn. <br /> <br />.Speed Assessment: The requester cites the reduction of speed on Waco Street as a benefit of the <br />stop sign. However, stop signs have been shown to be ineffective for speed control, except for a <br />distance of 100 to 200 feet from the intersection, and tend to cause speeds to increase in mid- <br />block areas. Since the predominant intersection movement is a right turn, the speed approaching <br />the intersection should be somewhat reduced under the current free right turn. <br /> <br />POTASSIUM AND 143RD <br /> <br />Site Distance: The sight distance on ali approaches is good. <br /> <br />Accident History.: A review of the five year accident history of this intersection, between <br />January 1, 1993 and December 31, 1997, shows no accidents. <br /> <br />Traffic Counts5 A traffic count showed 52 vehicles in a one-hour period during the afternoon <br />per/od. <br /> <br />Discussion; The request for stop signs by citizens in residential areas stems from the desire to <br />make their street safer. This concern is the common thread, which runs through all three of the <br />above requests before the committee. Although it provides a degree of reduced speed in the <br />vicinity of the signs, the placement of a stop sign has negative impacts. Studies suggest that a <br />stop sign can: (1) direct traffic to other residential streets; (2) increase noise, emissions and fuel <br />consumption associated with deceleration and acceleration; (3) increase speed mid-block; (4) <br />increase the number of rear-end accidents; (5) foster contempt for the signage because of its <br />proliferation; and (6) present false expectations to both motorists and pedestrian. <br /> <br />As the population of Ramsey grows and ages, the City will receive more requests as individuals <br />express similar concerns. The Manual of Uniform Traffic Control has relatively stringent <br />conditions for the placement of stop signs. It might be argued that such criteria have been <br />developed for the collector road system, and perhaps some different criteria might be better <br />suited to residential streets. It is my understanding that the City of Lakeville has developed such <br />criteria. It might also be useful to establish a citizen task force to study the various issues and <br />claims associated. <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br /> <br />It is staff's opinion that all three of the stop signs requested should not be Placed. The Potassium <br /> rd th <br />and 143 Lane and the Tungsten and 144 Lane because the traffic volume is too low and <br />because there have been no accidents, nor are there any conditions that would present a unique <br />hazard to the intersections. <br /> <br />G:[usersiCity Shared FilelCOUNC1LClStop Signs 5-18-99. doc 05/14/99 <br /> <br /> <br />