Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I$ <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I$ <br />I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br />! <br /> <br />Further Discassion: Commissioner Deemer stated that again the word "excessive" allows this <br />motion. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Bawden, Commissioners Deemer, Holland, <br />Hendriksen, ~d LaDue. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioners Terry and Thorud. <br /> <br />Motion by COmmissioner LaDue and seconded by Commissioner Holland to amend #16 to read <br />"That the Prol~osed use will not be unduly dangerous or otherwise detrimental to persons residing <br />or working in ~e vicinity or to the public welfare." <br /> <br />Motion carrie~L Voting Yes: Chairperson Bawden, Commissioners LaDue, Holland, Deemer and <br />Hendriksen. ¥oting No: None. Absent: Commissioners Terry and Thom& <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Holland and seconded by Commissioner Deemer to amend #17 to read <br />"That the prQposed use will be consistent with the intent and purposes of Chapter 9.03.04 <br />(Conditional lllse Permits) of the Ramsey City Code." <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Bawden, Commissioners Holland, Deemer, <br />Hendriksen, Md LaDue. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioners Terry and Thorud. <br /> <br />Motion by Coinmissioner Deemer and seconded by Commissioner Holland to add a trmding to read <br />"That at the Jgne 1, 1993 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting, the applicant stated he has <br />no objections to extending the conditional use permit to Lot 4." <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Bawden, Commissioners Deemer, Holland, <br />Hendriksen, Md LaDue. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioners Terry and Thorud. <br /> <br />The Commission was polled as to who had seen the subject property prior to the meeting. <br />Commissione~ Hendriksen had not seen it, Commissioner Holland had seen it 2 months prior, <br />Chairperson ngwd. en and Commissioner LaDue had seen it 1 1/2 months prior, and Commissioner <br />Deemer had s~n zt 2 weeks prior. <br /> <br />Commission~ I.,aDue inquired if Commissioner Deemer had seen any improvement from 1 1/2 <br />months ago tolhis visit 2 weeks ago, and Commissioner Deemer confirmed that he had, and if Mr. <br />Karst adheres ~o what is proposed, that it would be an improvement. <br />Commission~ Hendriksen stated that he had seen the inside in the past and that it conveys that Mr. <br />Karst doesn't 0are what people think of his operation. Commissioner Hendriksen stated that this is <br />a very offens!ve operation, and he fears that the City will have a repeat of Mr. Karst's past <br />practices. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Hendriksen and seconded by Commissioner Holland to table this case <br />until the next ~heefing so the Commissioners can review the property and the status of the permit. <br /> <br />Further DiscuSsion: An unidentified citizen stated there was quite a bit of run-off coming from <br />inside and tha~ the concrete is soaked coming from that dock. Commissioner Hendriksen stated <br />that in the past~ he has seen open 55 gallon oil drums standing in water, and he is concerned about <br />the intent to 0hange that. Mr. Karst mentioned that he has passed County, State and OSHA <br />inspections, a~d he advised that he has all the supplies on Lots 3 and 4 to put up the building and <br />would like to f~omplish this this summer. <br /> <br />Planning & Zoning Commission/June 1, 1993 <br /> Page 6 of 11 <br /> <br /> <br />