Laserfiche WebLink
State which required all cities to form these joint powers agreements or it would be the <br />county's responsibility to have a watershed district. He included a letter from Curt <br />Pearson, Attorney for the organization, outlining the amendments in the joint powers <br />agreement. He stated he would like to bring back this draft joint powers agreement after <br />Attorney Pearson has had a chance to comment on the amendments. With regard to the <br />formula .for splitting up the fees, Mr. Jankowski has been told by the attorney that this <br />formula isstandard for water management organizations. <br /> <br />Consensus of the Committee was that this issue should be tabled to allow for review by <br />Curt Pearson, Attorney for the WIVlO, followed with a review by City Attorney Goodrich. <br /> <br />Case #6: Review Non.compliance of Anoka Area Ice Arena Association, <br /> Inc. with regard to Lawful Gambling <br /> <br />Finance Officer Hart stated that that Anoka Area Ice Arena Association Inc. gambling <br />organization was not in compliance with City Code at the time of this case writing. She <br />stated she has now received the "packet of missing information" from the organization, <br />however, there was no money included. She feels this indicates they are still in non- <br />compliance with the City's Code. She stated this issue does not require any action by the <br />Commission at this point and that she would bring back a recommendation following the <br />charitable gambling information meeting. <br /> <br />Case 07: Review Cash Flow Projections for Landfill Funds <br /> <br />Finance Officer Hart stated that after September 1993, the City will no longer be receiving <br />the tipping fee from the landfill. She stated that if the City continues to use the tipping fee <br />as it is now, the funds would be completely depleted by 1999. She added that if there are <br />any major Changes in the manner in which the cap on the SCORE County Reimbursement <br />is calculated or in the charges for collection of recyclable materials, there would be a <br />dramatic impact on these projections. With regard to the Landfill Trust Fund, monies will <br />also ceas~ coming into this fund as of September 1993. $120,000 of interest earnings from <br />this fundare dedicated to the Park Improvement Fund through 1995. As the projections <br />indicate, at an average rate of return on our investments of 5%, there is a sufficient cash <br />balance remaining after the park improvement allocations each year through the analysis <br />period. It will be necessary to keep a minimum balance in this fund of $2,400,000 (with <br />an annual average interest at no less than 5%) in order to meet our allocation to the Park <br />Improvement Fund without dipping into the principal balance. Also from the landfill trust <br />fund, it is projected to utilize $60,000 each year for 10 years as one source of funding for <br />the planned Public Works/Police building project. It appears feasible to continue funding <br />these items and maintain a balance of $2,400,000 in the fund. Ms. Hart explained that this <br />case would be brought back to the policy setting meeting in September. <br /> <br />Case O8: Charitable Gambling Cash Flow Projections <br /> <br />Finance Officer Hart stated that with the current and future status of the City of Ramsey's <br />Charitable Gambling Ordinance, she determined it would not be in the best interest to <br />attempt to do a cash flows projection at this time. <br /> <br />Consensu t of the Finance Committee was to table this case. <br /> <br />Finance Committee/August 24, 1993 <br /> Page 3 of 4 <br /> <br /> <br />