Minutes - Parks and Recreation Commission - 04/10/2003

Home

Case #1: Parks/Utiliti~ single famil~ Boulevard. and propos between t he access to th{ single famil' Supervisor [ He stated alt He suggested utilizing a po Parks/Utilitie constructed the area. l~ecommend Park Dedication for Tiger Meadows ,~s S,Hpervisor Boos explained Tiger Meadows sketch plan is proposing to plat 12- ' 2.5~ acre parcels on the property located east of Tiger Street and east of Armstrong He presented the Planning Commission case, which included the site location map d ~etch plan. Parks/Utilities Supervisor Boos explained primary discussions de~eloper and the City have been regarding the need to provide for a secondary pl4t and provide a second access to the existing Autumn Meadows addition, the residential development located to the east of the proposed plat. Parks/Utilities ~o~ reviewed the options for a secondary access to the plat with the Commission. ashionly Park Dedication would be $19,000, with a cash only Trail Fee at $5,225. th~ Parks Commission may wish to discuss improvements to Autumn Heights Park · rt~o~a of the above proceeds. s S6pervisor Boos asked in absence of a trail plan, do they recommend a trail to be lon{[ County Road 83 consistent with past practice even though there is not a trail in Commissioner R01fe inquired if Tiger Street was an MSA (Municipal Stated Aid) street. Park/Utilitie~ Su@ervisor Boos indicated he did not know the answer but he believed it might not be. ', Commission~ Olds asked if they did construct a trail along Tiger Street, continuing along the park along A~'rnsffong Boulevard, what would happen at the existing property which is not in the blat· [ ! Parks/Utilitie! Stipervisor Boos stated he did not know that they would want to go around the back of it butlthey could shift into the road right-of-way. Chairperson ~)hn~ inquired if there was any blacktop trails to the southeast of Nutria. Park/Utilities tSu;ervisor Boos stated there was not any pavement there. He explained what was unique about lhe ~utumn Heights Park development was that each lot had park property adjacent to it. Chairperson J~)hn~ indicated that she meant to ask if they had trails on these areas. Parks/Utilitie~ SUpervisor Boos stated t here w as not a t rail b ut t he City d id own t he 1 and for future trails, 1:. ~w0ver the strips of land are quite narrow. Chairperson J )hn~ commented that she would have to imagine that Armstrong would need a trail because it is a im~portant link. Commissione~ O~s asked if the property owner proposing this is the owner of the item highlighted in[the ~nap. Park and Recreation Commission/April 10, 2003 Page 2 of 8