My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Planning Commission - 06/25/2003 - Special
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Planning Commission
>
2003
>
Minutes - Planning Commission - 06/25/2003 - Special
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 4:00:58 PM
Creation date
7/22/2003 12:26:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Title
Special
Document Date
06/25/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
take care of <br />the alignme~ <br />them to ope <br /> <br />all ~fthe comments before it goes to the City Council. Regarding the site, he agrees <br />tt islbetter, with the homes fronting on County Road 116, and noted this has allowed <br />n up an area for a small play structure if needed. He stated it is his company's <br /> <br />finding that the~ type of homes are typically low in the number of children living there, so they <br />have stoppe~ pu~ting in tot lots, adding their market studies have shown that families are buying <br />single-family h~mes rather than townhomes. He noted there is a walkway through the <br />development if d. hildren are present. <br /> [ <br />Chairperson~qi~ asked about the tree preservation required. <br /> <br />Mr. Domer ~ndi~ated at the previous meeting the tree preservation ordinance was tabled, and he <br />had come pr a~ed w~th a presentation on preservatmn and moving of trees. He noted they have <br />given the twr0 p~vious landowners permission to move trees if desired, and commented that one <br />of the owner~ was on the tree preservation committee. He stated it is their intent to move or save <br />as many tree~ as{possible, adding that the impact of a moved tree is significantly greater than the <br />impact ofthr~e or four seedlings, even if they are six or eight foot seedlings. <br /> <br />Principal Ph <br />Anderson w~ <br />not desirable <br /> <br />Commission <br />was an entrat <br /> <br />Mr. Domme~ <br /> <br />met Trudgeon noted that when he and Community Development Assistant Chris <br />lke~ the property they noted many significant trees, but also a lot of trees that are <br />to dave. <br /> <br />~r Shepherd asked about the southwest comer of the property, questioning if that <br />tce, Iand if they may be able to put a playground at that location. <br /> <br />staled it is a visual entrance, and they could have something there, but noted they <br /> <br />are trying to ble~.~ d with the Town Center, as well as give their residents some privacy. He <br />demonstrated~ an {alternative location on outlot 3 that may be conducive to a small play area. <br /> <br />Chairperson l~Iix~ agreed it would be better to locate it away from the major roadways. <br /> <br />Commissioner Shepherd added it would be closer to more homes in that location as well. <br /> <br />Commlss~onOr Jbhnson asked what the developer's thoughts were on the right in, right out <br />requirements.[ <br /> <br />Mr. Dommer istaWd he did not understand that to be the case for both roads, and thought it would <br />only be on Ratmsey Boulevard. <br /> <br />Principal Plar~ er :,Trudgeon stated the developer was correct, and he had misspoke originally. He <br />clarified Coufi~ty Road 116 would be a full access intersection. <br /> <br />Chairperson Blixl~ indicated the report says the roadway improvements on County Road 116 <br />would be thefrest~onsibility of the developer, and clarified only those necessary because of this <br />development ¢tot~d be their responsibility. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/June 25, 2003 <br /> Page 3 of 8 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.