My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 11/27/2007
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2007
>
Agenda - Council - 11/27/2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 1:55:59 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 1:11:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
11/27/2007
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
297
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
portion of Alpine Park. She stated that according to City Code, the tower must be located on <br />City owned property, when possible. <br />Councilmember Dehen arrived at the meeting. <br />Associate Planner Dalnes stated that the applicant, after discussion with staff, has suggested the <br />tower be located on the western side of the park. She noted that staff had put together four <br />alternative locations in the general vicinity, including two other sites within Alpine Park. She <br />reviewed the proposed sites on the east side of Alpine Park, south of Alpine Drive -west of <br />Variolite, south central side of Alpine Park, and just east of current proposed location. <br />Councilmember Strommen asked if staff had looked at any sites that maybe she feels tha current <br />meet current code requirements to be City owned property. She stated that <br />City code may be antiquated. <br />Associate Planner Dalnes stated that staff only looked at City owned property, which is very <br />limited in this area. She stated that other park areas are surrounded by residential areas. <br />Community Development Director Trudgeon stated that staff did not look elsewhere because <br />everything in the area was residential. <br />Councilmember Dehen asked how many towers were located in the City. <br />Associate Planner Dalnes stated that she believes there are 7 or 8 in the city. <br />Councilmember Dehen stated that these towers are not pretty, and wondered how Ramsey <br />stacked up against other communities. He stated that he would like to know what other cities are <br />doing about towers and whether they can be located in industrial areas. <br />Associate Planner Dalnes stated that the location of this tower is pala because highest is <br />looking to fill their coverage areas. She stated that some cities put ante g point <br />on each block and stated that the higher the tower, the better the coverage. <br />Councilmember Dehen asked whether an extension could be built on the tower just south <br />of this location, so it would be high enough to give the coverage T- Mobile needs <br />Councilmember Elvig arrived at the meeting. <br />Community Development Director Trudgeon stated that this issue waxes and wanes and noted <br />that this is the first time the issue has been raised in about 7 years. He stated that staff is hearing <br />loud and clear that the existing ordinance may be not adequate. <br />Mayor Gamec asked if the tower were put behind the ball fields at Alpine Park, where the access <br />road would be. <br />—162— <br />City Council Work Session / October 30, 2007 <br />Page 2 of 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.