Laserfiche WebLink
I iS my opinion that the doors and lighting conditions_ in . <br />the interior of the booths still serve to preserve the anonymity <br />of persons using the booths and therefore the booths constitute <br />construction which is conducive to the practice of high-risk <br />sexual conduct. The cloth jammed into the peephole demonstrates <br />that peepholes can be easily defeated as devices for observation. <br />To allow other than the removal of the doors entirely will only <br />open up a wide range of "game playing" in creating apertures that <br />will be touted as being in compliance with the ordinance and the <br />findings of the Administrative Law Judge. The decision of the <br />ALJ clearly states on page seven, under RECO~HENDATION, (b) <br />"remove the doors from the viewing booths in order that such <br />booths have at least one side open...". <br /> It is my recommendation that the City now proceed to <br />District Court to either force abatement of the problem or force <br />closure until it is abated. <br /> <br />Mike Auspos <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I, <br /> <br /> <br />