Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Councilmember Olson stated that rather than institute a new ordinance, she would like to see <br />how encouraging driveway paving works on a voluntary basis. She stated that she is not in favor <br />of creating a new ordinance. She stated that the City has too much rural property to require <br />paved driveways. <br /> <br />Councilmember Dehen clarified that he was not advocating that people should have to pave their <br />entire driveway, but the end portion to keep the gravel and dirt off of the roadways. He stated <br />that the City currently has a voluntary system for paving and people are not doing it. <br /> <br />Councilmember Olson stated that she feels the City can communicate with people and put them <br />on notice that the City is moving in the direction of wanting driveways to be paved. <br /> <br />Councilmember Dehen stated that he feels that is where having an ordinance could come into <br />play because it could state that residents have two years to complete the paving. <br /> <br />Chair Elvig stated that there are safety issues in some cases, but if it is paved back 10 or 12 feet, <br />about 90% of the problem would be eliminated. <br /> <br />Public Works Director Reimer stated that he has seen a study for trail projects in farm areas that <br />concluded that paving should be 35 to 40 feet off the road to allow for the materials to fall off the <br />tires before it gets to the roadway. <br /> <br />Chair Elvig stated that farm tires are different than car tires and noted that he is not in favor of <br />having an ordinance on this issue. He stated that he would support paving a 10 or 12- foot apron. <br /> <br />City Administrator Ulrich stated that the City could provide a "carrot" for residents that this can <br />be completed as part of a larger project and they can be assessed for the costs. <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski stated that the survey he drafted tries to determine the degree of interest <br />in people wanting to have their driveways paved. He stated that there are about 400 driveways in <br />the City that are unpaved. <br /> <br />City Administrator Ulrich cautioned that the City should make sure it is not sending the message <br />that it will force residents to pave their driveways, ifthat is not what the City is intending to do. <br /> <br />Councilmember Dehen stated that he understands the concerns raised by Councilmembers Olson <br />and Elvig, but feels there are inspectors that tell homeowners the type of plumbing, outlets, <br />shingles and other materials that they can have in their homes. He stated that he feels paving <br />driveways will save people money, in the long run, because it won't drag gravel onto the roads. <br />He stated that he feels the City could move forward with this on a voluntary basis, with and eye <br />towards making this an ordinance in the future. <br /> <br />Councilmember Olson stated that constituents from her ward and Chair Elvig's ward will not <br />support an ordinance because they want a rural feel to the community and imposing driveway <br />paving would fly in the face ofthat feel. <br /> <br />Public Works. Committee INovember 20,2007 <br />Page 7 of9 <br /> <br />":":~~~_;.v.f~ - .. <br />