My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council Work Session - 11/27/2007
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council Work Session
>
2007
>
Minutes - Council Work Session - 11/27/2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 2:48:41 PM
Creation date
12/18/2007 10:18:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
11/27/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Mayor Gamec stated that he thinks the real problem with the format is in scheduling. He stated <br />that there needs to be a committed day and time for the sessions. He stated that other cities have <br />a set day and time for their updates. <br /> <br />Councilmember Dehen stated that he agrees that having the interplay of two people discussing <br />the issues is good, but is not a fan of having the City Councilmembers do it. He stated that he <br />feels this format has the potential for advocating individual opinions of the Councilmembers. He <br />stated that he likes the idea of having the City Administrator and Assistant City Administrator <br />discuss the cases. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec stated that he thinks the residents like to see the Councilmembers discussing what <br />happened at the meeting and thinks less people would watch if the discussion wasn't held by the <br />City Council. <br /> <br />Councilmember Dehen noted that his concern is with the possible opportunity this gives for the <br />City Council to tilt or convey certain messages with the way a discussion is portrayed on the <br />show. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec stated that the discussion should simply state whether a motion passed or not and <br />should not give details about how each Councilmember voted. <br /> <br />Councilmember Dehen stated that he feels dissenting views are important because it gives <br />perspective on the reasons behind the decisions so he feels it may be important to know what the <br />actual vote was. <br /> <br />Councilmember Strommen stated that she feels the update show should be used to discuss the <br />meeting and the ultimate decision that was made. She stated that the debated points could be <br />summarized. <br /> <br />Councilmember Dehen stated that he is not sure if he would like someone else summarizing <br />what he says and would like to be able to summarize his own position. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec stated that he did not think the summary was of a specific person's point of view, <br />but what the whole City Council discussed and decided. <br /> <br />Councilmember Look stated that he thinks Councilmember Dehen's point is that having the City <br />Administrator and Assistant City Administrator giving the update is safer than having two City <br />Councilmembers doing it because then the Councilmember cannot lobby for their position. <br /> <br />Councilmember Dehen agreed and noted that he also supports having the City Administrator and <br />Assistant City Administrator do the update because of the scheduling problems. He stated that he <br />is self employed and does not always know if and when he would be available for the update. <br /> <br />Councilmember Strommen stated that she also has scheduling problems because she works in St. <br />Paul and it is not feasible for her to drive here in the middle of the day for the update. <br /> <br />City Council Work Session I November 27, 2007 <br />Page 6 of7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.