My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Planning Commission - 12/06/2007
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Planning Commission
>
2007
>
Minutes - Planning Commission - 12/06/2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 3:50:43 PM
Creation date
1/8/2008 2:35:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
12/06/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Associate Planner DaInes stated with the current ordinance they would track it through a permit. <br />With the proposed ordinance they would not be requiring a permit or fee so she would propose <br />they go out once a month and record the signs to determine what signs have been placed in the <br />City. <br /> <br />Commissioner VanScoy asked if someone needed a temporary sign for six months, is that <br />permitted. <br /> <br />Associate Planner DaInes indicated it is not allowed, and would be considered a permanent sign. <br /> <br />Commissioner VanScoy wondered if there would be a way to have an exception for this. <br /> <br />Associate Planner DaInes stated staff could explore this and come back with some suggestions. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hunt stated he understood but did not think someone would want to construct a <br />more permanent sign for six months. He thought there could be some type of permitting process <br />that could be done for this if they can show cause. He thought this may be something that could <br />be handled on the staff level. <br /> <br />The Commission indicated they would like to some sort of flexibility for longer sign display. <br /> <br />Commissioner Brauer stated the fifty square feet sign in a residential area is a big sign and <br />thought the size should be lowered. <br /> <br />Associate Planner DaInes stated currently they do not have any sign size limit and by indicating a <br />size limit to fifty feet, this tightens up things. She stated if they start limiting residential <br />properties, they start limiting what was allowed in the past and that was what she was trying to <br />avoid was to make things stricter than what they were in the past. <br /> <br />Commissioner Van Scoy stated he was comfortable with the changes. <br /> <br />Commissioner Brauer wondered if they could have Chairperson Nixt review this before an <br />approval was brought forward. <br /> <br />Associate Planner DaInes stated staff could do this. <br /> <br />Case #4: <br /> <br />Staff Update <br /> <br />Interim Associate Community Development Director Geisler reviewed the staff update with the <br />Commission. <br /> <br />Case #5: <br /> <br />Zoning Bulleting <br /> <br />The Zoning Bulletin was reviewed. <br /> <br />Planning CommissionlDecember 6, 2007 <br />Page 9 of 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.