My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 12/11/2007
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
2007
>
Minutes - Council - 12/11/2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 2:36:55 PM
Creation date
2/12/2008 2:11:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
12/11/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Motion carried. V oting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Strommen, Dehen, and Olson. <br />Voting No: Councilmembers Jeffrey and Look. Absent: Councilmember Elvig. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec stated that this has been a very difficult issue and thanked everyone for attending <br />the meetings and giving their input to the City Council. <br /> <br />Case #4: <br /> <br />Consider Deletion of Segments of 167th Avenue from Collector Roadway Plan <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski reviewed the rationale for creating a collector street system. He stated <br />that MSA collector streets are intended to facilitate traffic beyond the local residential traffic. He <br />stated that the City has tried to place collector streets on one mile grids and 167th is one such <br />grid. He stated that this has been included in the comprehensive plan for many years and <br />recently a neighborhood west of Variolite Street became aware of the plans and voiced their <br />concern to the Public Works Committee. He stated that after hearing their concerns, the Public <br />Works Committee recommended that the first portion of this road that would straighten out four <br />90 degree angle turns completed, but that the remainder of the projects be delayed in the CIP <br />until 2011 and 2012. He stated that these plans were discussed at recent comprehensive planning <br />meetings and the residents again voiced their concern about the plans. He stated that at the City <br />Council Work Session meeting on November 20,2007, the City Council directed staff to prepare <br />a resolution to eliminate the portion of the planned roadway past the section with the 90-degree <br />angle turns. He stated that this roadway improvement was to be funded with $350,000 of MSA <br />funds and if the remainder of the roadway is not constructed, the City would lose this funding. <br />He stated that residents in the Welcomes Road area have recently had their road paved and have <br />had quite a bit of additional through traffic in their neighborhood. He stated that they have said <br />that they were looking forward to 167th being a collector street because it would give the <br />Welcomes Road area some relief from through traffic. He stated that staff would like to offer the <br />City Council some alternatives to consider, like retaining the segment from CR 5 to Variolite <br />Street and eliminating the other section. He stated that staff is recommending that the City <br />Council adopt Resolution B that allows the area with four 90 degree turns to be completed and <br />redesign the road with the terminus to be located across from 165th Lane. He stated that all the <br />alignment issues have not been reviewed. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec stated that it had been the intent of the City Council to eliminate the other <br />segments of the road until it found out that the City would lose $350,000 to complete this section <br />if the whole thing isn't designated. <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski stated that the City cannot retain the MSA route as planned, construct <br />the street and then remove it from the system the following year because the City would have to <br />pay the prorated portion of the cost, which would be 19/20 . <br /> <br />Councilmember Dehen stated that the City Council did commit to the residents that section 2 <br />would not be completed, but if the City doesn't do it, it loses the funding. He asked how the City <br />can make the connection between MSA roads if this portion is not constructed. <br /> <br />Councilmember Look and Mayor Gamec left the Council Chambers at 8:33 p.m. <br /> <br />City Council / December 11,2007 <br />Page 11 of 25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.