My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
04/08/92
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Economic Development Commission
>
Minutes
>
1992
>
04/08/92
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/27/2025 4:22:02 PM
Creation date
7/23/2003 3:51:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Document Title
Economic Development Commission
Document Date
04/08/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Schroeder inquired if each property is reviewed and if the amenities of each <br />property arel: tthken into consideration. <br /> <br />Mr. Keefeir~plied that each property is assessed every four years and if there are any <br />improvemefif~ offadditions to a property, it would be reflected in the next assessment. <br /> <br />Upon inquiW as to why valuations have increased; Mr. Keefe replied sales ratio studies show that <br />before the ~9.91 teassessment, values and sales were widely dispersed and not within the State's <br />minimum ahd maximum deviations from the actual market value. The State and County currently <br />hold assess0rS aO~:ountable to defend the values they place upon properties. If a City is found to be <br />in violation~ then.:the County or State may step in and raise values appropriately and bill all charges <br />back to the ~2ity. ~The ratio of assessed value to sale value is to be at 95%. In 1989, the coefficient <br />of dispersiOn~wai~ over 25% for Ramsey's commercial properties. This required the City Assessor <br />to reassess ~[ commercial property and bring the valuation up to the proper level as required by the <br />State and C~finty~ This presented some problems because the City did not have the physical data <br />and all site~ !had to be reinspected. Some properties go up and some will go down with the <br />reassessme~ti The primary reason for the increase was that the land values were too low and did <br />not reflect ~al value of the property. <br /> <br />Commissiohcr Oorecki asked when assessing and doing inspection, if the value of the property is <br />taken into cb~sideration. <br /> <br />Mr. Keefe replied that the value is based mainly upon the size of the property. <br /> <br />Commissioner Nelson suggested that if someone is marketing a property and it is not sold, then <br />perhaps it is Yalued too high. <br /> <br />Mr. Keefe ox.,p, lmtted that ~s the very reason that the assessor wall use an actual sale price rather than <br />"asking pri~', bi, cause many people ask for a higher price that the actual value and the property <br />will not sel~m, a timely fashion. <br /> <br />Commissio~hCr V~evea stated that taxes are the basis of all of the economy Ramsey has. There is <br />enough undeyel0~ped, industrially zoned property to last for the next 20 years. If the City raises <br />taxes on thi~ property, people will stop paying the taxes and it will become tax forfeit and become <br />property oftlie City; therefore, no tax revenue will be collected. Small businesses want to move to <br />a location ~i~h lOwer taxes. He also stated that on his business alone, he previously paid $3,500 <br />in taxes an~ t, hey have now been raised to $7,000. Commissioner Vevea suggested the City use <br />Tax Increment Financing to build a business incubator program. <br /> <br />Chairpersort Wagner stated that a subcommittee for developing and industrial development plan for <br />the City is Workit!g on a large scope plan to be used to develop the commercially zoned area of the <br />City. <br /> <br />CommissiogCr Vevea stated that as taxes are increased, they are causing the City and the Country <br />to erode an~ !hat the City cannot be so intent upon extending municipal services to the industrial <br />areas. <br /> <br />Mr. Keefe Stated. that taxes on industrial property have risen more than on residential properties and <br />that a resid~r!tia[property valued at $150,000 would pay approximately $1,050 in taxes whereas <br />the same $1~0,000 commercial property would pay between $3,000 to $3,500 in taxes. In the <br /> <br />Economic Development Commission / April 8, 1992 <br /> Page 3 of 4 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.