Laserfiche WebLink
future, as t~ le~slature changes, the residential properties may have to pay a higher tax rate. <br />Currently, this i// something that is set by the legislature and the City has no control over the <br />situation. <br /> <br />Chairpersor~ Wagner then inquired as to the available recourse if people disagree with their <br />assessed va~e. <br />Mr. Keefe r~_lied that they have the following options: <br /> 1. : T@ meet with him prior to the Board of Review meeting to be held on April 15, <br /> ~ 1992. <br /> 2. Ai:tend the Board of Review and present their case to the City Council, then to <br /> ~ at,tend the Board of Review at the County level and then to Tax Court where value <br /> : would be set. <br /> <br />Chairpersor~ Wagner excused himself from the meeting at 8:55 a.m. <br />Case #1: BUsiness Visitation Plan. <br /> <br />This case was tabled due to lack of time. <br /> <br />Case #2: BUsiness Appreciation Day and Business EXPO. <br /> <br />This case was tab}ed due to lack of time. <br />Case #3::: SUbcommittee Updates. <br /> <br />This case was tabled due to lack of time. <br /> <br />Motion by Co. mgaissioner Thorson and seconded by Commissioner Schroeder to adjourn the <br />meeting of t~e ECOnomic Development Commission. <br /> <br />Motion carri.~'~d. ¥oting Yes: Commissioners Gorecki, Nelson, Thorson,.Vevea and Schroeder. <br />Voting No: !None. Absent: Chairperson Wagner, Commissioners Greenberg, Fults and Kent. <br /> <br />The meeting adjourned at 9:00 a.m. <br /> <br />RespectfullY submitted, <br /> <br />James D. Gt~ombeffg~ <br />Project Manger <br /> <br />Economic Development Commission / April 8, 1992 <br /> Page 4 of 4 <br /> <br /> <br />