05/12/92 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Councilme~ber ~eterson expressed concern with how it would affect negotiations with the AFSCME ~oup. Councilmeniber I4lardin stated that if Council feels there is validity in this plan, a settlement should oe votect on.;~ !' Councilmen~ber Beyer stated she feels this is a good plan but the problem is with performance concerns. S~,¢: added that recommending that City Council adopt this plan tonight will not be in line in barg~nin~with AFSCME. She stated she is not suggesting anything be taken away but she bargaining good faith. believes tha~wai ~t!ng will show theunit Councilme~ber Hardin stated there is the time value of money to be considered and there are people want~g t~f get this settled. City AdminiStratbr Schroeder stated that mediation is basically a discussion with a third party in attendance v~ho t~'es to get the two sides to agree. He stated it has nothing to do with dealing with good faith b~.gaihing. He understood that but for the performance plan, Council wasn't ready to give a 5.24~ inc~. ase as 2.3% is the normal cost of living and the rest is merit. Motion by 0_~. unOlmember Peterson and seconded by Councilmember Beyer to recommend to City Council to ~able tthis decision until after the May 26, 1992 meeting. The intent is to make a recommendation 0t that time. Motion can'ged~. Voting Yes: Councilmembers Peterson, Beyer and Hardin. Voting No: None. COMMIT'~EE ;INPUT ; There is a ~n~iafion session set for 10:30 a.m. May 19, 1992. ADJOURNMENT Motion by ~ouncilmember Hardin and seconded by Councilmember Beyer to adjourn the meeting. Motion carr~.. Voting Yes: Councilmembers Hardin, Beyer and Peterson. Voting No: None. The regular ,meetihg of the Negotiating Committee adjourned at 6:29 p.m. Respectfull~ SUb r~rtitted, ~roeder City Administrator Negotiating Committee/May 12, 1992 Page 3 of 3