Laserfiche WebLink
<br />B. Refine the vision statement <br />. Follow the draft process laid out by the steering group. <br />. An interim committee might be needed to work with the OST results in Atlas. <br />. Draft a vision statement for review by the workgroup. <br /> <br />C. Create a checklist of core objectives that will guide subsequent policy and process <br />recommendations. <br />. Synthesize comments into a checklist that incorporates the OSTresults, represents <br />the bestthinking of the working group, and anticipates the policy discussion in the <br />next ,step. This may take the form of a draft checklist for review by the group <br />throughout the process. <br />. An interim committee may be necessary to refine this checklist over time. <br /> <br />D. Identification and evaluation of alternative public policies and practices. <br />. Create a menu of alternative approaches to growth management. <br />. Create the necessary worksheets for work group analysis and discussion. <br />. Create a summary of recommended approaches. <br /> <br />E. Review by larger . <br />. Collaborate with staff and others to present results to the larger community in an <br />Open Space Technology(OST) format event. <br />. Itis anticipated that the city will bring OST specialists back for this event. <br /> <br />Timeline <br />The work described in this proposal will occur by the end of June 2008. Specific <br />timelines will depend on the will of the work group and city staff. The work is intended <br />to be coordinated with other city comprehensive planning efforts. <br /> <br />Budget <br />The cost of the work described in this proposal is a lump sum of $7500. This includes <br />staffing and meeting time, travel costs, and incidental costs. A detailed cost and time <br />estimate will be produced upon request. An invoice will be sent monthly, payable in 30 <br />days. <br /> <br />-25- <br />