Minutes - Council - 01/11/1992 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Was my Time S~nt Profile (TSP~ manipulated? No. Can I redo'my TSP7 Each time the City submits a TSP to Personnel Decisions, Inc. the cost is $30. If an :' 'r,~pIz)yee feels that their position has changed significantly, they will be allowed to complete ~ Ocaupational Analysis Questionnaire. What hannens it' management doesn't agree that I do a specific task? An employee may file an appeal tc; ifi~r ~pamnent Head to within 15 days of the posting of the results. The employee and DepartmeritiHe$td will again review the Time Spent Profile (TSP). The Department Head will present a wtitt~,n findings/recommendation to the employee and the City Administrator. If an employee istnot satisfied with the findings by the Department Head, the employee may submit a written ap~l~al to the Personnel Coordinator who will determine whether the appeal should be forwarded tb the Appeals Committee. The City of Ramsey has formed a Comparable Worth Appeals C¢~n~.'.ttee (chosen randomly from volunteers) to hear any appeals that have not been able to be resolved between the employee and their Department Head, consisting of 1 Department Head/Supct~vis¢r (Steve Jankowski), 1 Public Works (Grant Riemer), 1 Clerical/Administrative (Gayle ROgers); 1 Patrol Officer (Bob Kuhn), and the Personnel Coordinator (Kay McAloney). Challeng~ iforgtarded to the Appeals Committee will concern the Time Spent Profiles. The affected e~ployee and Department Head have the option to meet with the Committee. At the meeting, ;the~Committee will review the appeal and the Department Head's findings/~r(m~ommendations. The Committee will make a decision on the appeal within 15 days and communicate the same in writing to the employee, Department Head, and the City Administrator. The City A~istrator will review and reach a final determination on decision s reached by the Appeals ~C..ommi~ 'tree and communicate the same in writing to the employee and Department Head. This decision is a final and binding determination. ~f the study is irrelevant then why ~lon't we throw ,it out7 As demonstrated in attachment numbers 1, 2 and ~'[hel~ is validity to the Study results. If an employee feels that there is a discrepancy between tb~ ~unt of time they say they perform on a given task and the time shown on the most current TSP, tl/ey may file an appeal. If someone is moved from satarv re'adc 2.5 to 1.5. do they move to ~ade 1.5 as well as the salary ~ This is a policy ~l~ision of Council. - - ' Where will the funds come from to implement the Comvarable Worth. Plan? The assumption that Comp Woi'th will result in large pay increases in incorrect. It may be possible to implement a pay program rat very little, if any, cost. Management, however, has attempted to discuss a pay plan which recognizes performance steps and would result in pay and budget increases above the general increase. This has little to do with Comp Worth but more so with performance. 1992 AF$CME Contract Attached is a Copy of the AFSCME and City proposals and the respective cost comparison of each. A meetinrg with AFSCME is scheduled for Friday, January 17, 1992 at 3:30 p.m. at City Hall. 1992 LELS Contract Attached is a copy of the LELS roposals and the respective cost comparison of each.