My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 05/13/2008
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2008
>
Agenda - Council - 05/13/2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 9:19:34 AM
Creation date
5/9/2008 2:15:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
05/13/2008
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
294
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
being proposed to split this off from the existing property so it can be lived in. <br />Your office told me it was an "illegal" apartment right now and yet there is <br />definitely someone living out there already. There were trucks and trailers <br />coming and going with stuff being unloaded into it and every morning when I <br />drive to work I can see from Armstrong that there are vehicles parked outside <br />with frost on them. We were under the impression that the conditional use permit <br />for this building was solely for it to be used as a riding stable. Again, I am <br />strongly against the changes being proposed and feel the city should step up and <br />insure it's residents that it is following up to hold these people to the activities <br />that the permit sets out for <br />6. I was told by your office that the owner purchased the property with an <br />"expectation" of what could be done in that building If this is the reasoning <br />behind why you feel the owners should be allowed to operate a business or sub - <br />divide the property I have 3 major issues with this <br />a. It was the owner's responsibility to check with the appropriate authorities <br />prior to purchasing to insure they could do what they wanted to do there. <br />b From what we've seen, there are documented and recorded conditional use <br />permits on the property. They clearly state what they are to be used for If <br />the city doesn't stand up for this and stop it from happening, that would <br />mean that anyone could get a conditional use permit passed and he about <br />it's use, construct a structure, once the structure is there and they get <br />caught, then whine to the city that they had different "expectations" of <br />what they thought it could be used for and get it passed. <br />c. This property is zoned RESIDENTIAL. Why would anyone think that <br />they could operate an industrial business in a residential neighborhood? If <br />these people are business owners, I'm sure they are smart enough to figure <br />out that you have to have a permit to do so and there would right away be <br />issues with the zoning. <br />It is my hope that the city of Ramsey will do the right thing for it's residents (not just one, <br />but the majority) and stick to what this property was meant to be used as. A large horse <br />farm with a riding arena. Do not allow more traffic in and out of our quiet street, the <br />chemicals that would be used into our residential neighborhood and use this as a reminder <br />on any future projects that the city should follow up on these permits to insure they aren't <br />being mis -used. It could happen in your neighborhood. <br />I understand from someone in your office that this letter may not be considered because . <br />we are choosing to remain anonymous, however I feel a lot of residents including some <br />of my other neighbors would speak out if they didn't have to fear retaliation so I hope <br />you will consider this. <br />Sincerely, <br />Very concerned resident on Baugh Street. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.