My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council Work Session - 04/15/2008
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council Work Session
>
2008
>
Minutes - Council Work Session - 04/15/2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 1:59:48 PM
Creation date
5/15/2008 8:25:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
04/15/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />opposite from the City staff agenda and path taken in past years, while a Developer w~s proposing many <br />ideas to the city, and an increase Above R-1 zoning was suggested. <br /> <br />Some land on the West shore of this lake is now owned by the City, It is not ye~ designated for Park, and <br />as far as I can determine. has no restrictions on. its use in the acqUiring documents. therefore options to <br />use this for other purposes does exist. A small passive picnic area in the North property would be nice! <br />and with the DNR restrictions on this lakes shore use, it would be nearly impossible to build a structure in <br />this area where the grandfathered nonconforming structures were removed. <br /> <br />There are several altemative$ to .a trail connecting Alpine Park to the Sunwood Drive trail, not limited to <br />an almost straight trail on property that is already under State or City control west of Sunfish Lake Blvd. <br />That would take people down the west side of the wetland area along county 57, and provide much more <br />wildlife for viewing.and not intrude on any properties privacy. Tttis would also be much safer in concept <br />and keep people away from the County .57 right of way where traffic is regularly traveling ill ex~ 0/60 <br />MPH. <br /> <br />A trail along the West Side of Grass Lake would also have to have it's south end within the'right of way of <br />county 57, where it would connect to the Sunwood Drive trail. This access restriction is in the documents <br />for acquiring the Parcels to construct Sunwood Drive. <br /> <br />T~ are many reasons for NOT PUTTING a trail along the shoreline, First and foremost is that people <br />on this lake do not want it. I understand that a Passive public area, with NO VEHICLE PARKING would. . <br />be accepted and I am not opposed to that. <br /> <br />I can agree with many good things the city attempts to do. but to plan something over and ov~r until the <br />taxpayers just give up is not something I would support. We once threw out a council majority including a <br />mayor in an election o'if3r actions opposing the citizens wi5hes at that time. <br /> <br />My property has already suffered the great devaluation by having its Lake frontage removed with-the <br />installation of a Street across it. I do not wish to see friends and neighbors suffer this same problem. <br /> <br />Sincerely <br /> <br />B~eemei:~'" <br />.'~ ~7~-"" <br />f. unfish Lake Blvd. / <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.