Agenda - Council - 05/27/2008 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

'. CASE # '4 RECEIVE PETITION FOR ANDRIE STREET /164TH LANE IMPROVEMENTS By: Steven Jankowski, City Engineer Background: At the May 20, 2008 Public Works Committee meeting the Committee was presented with a .petition signed by84 persons associated with properties included in IP.08-06, a bituminous overlay ofAndrie Street, 164th Lane and the three cuI de sacs to its north. This petition is attached to this case and requests the following improvements be considered in lieu of those currentlyproposed under 08-06 which include the following elements: · Andrie Street and 1 64th Lane be reconstructed at approximately the same width (32 feet versus 31 feet) with concrete curb and gutter. · Andrie Street and 164th Lane be striped for two driving lanes and a parking lane on one side only (parking to be restricted on the opposite side). · A five foot concrete sidewalk not be installed on the east and north sides ofAndrie Street and 164th Lane. - · Existing storm water catch basins be replaced and storm sewer be extended to portions of Andrie Street in several areas. · The three cuI de sacs, Halas, Fortmann, and Driscoll Circles, receive only a bituminous overlay of the existing pavement as proposed under the current project. In addition, the petition is requesting that the assessment for these improvements be limited to one half the cost ofthe bituminous overlay as currently proposed under IP 08-06. Since a portion of the project costs are anticipated to be special assessed to the benefitted properties, the next step would be the preparation of a feasibility study describing the scope of the improvements to be made along with their costs and financing. The petitioners have been advised that this project would not be possible to be constructed until after the 2008 construction season. The proposed improvements on the cuI de sac streets are considerably different in scope and cost from those being proposed on Andrie Street and 164th Lane. Staff suggests that these properties be considered under a separate project. Attached to this case is a figure illustrating the petitioners within the benefitted area as suggested by staff. It should be noted that 36 of 68 of the properties have signed this petition Project Interactions: It is worth noting that the petitioned project will be a separate project from IP 08-06. Although IP 08-06 has not been authorized by Council as were the other Street Maintenance Program projects onMay 13, 2008, the Council has asked that alternate bids be solicited for this project. This keeps open the possibility that this project may be authorized sometime during the 2008 -91-