My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 05/27/2008
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2008
>
Agenda - Council - 05/27/2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 9:20:43 AM
Creation date
5/22/2008 3:26:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
05/27/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
186
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />construction season. Presumably, this might occur if the alternate project is rejected following <br />the public hearing. A project cannot be authorized by Council until after a 60 day period <br />following the hearing and a petition against the project canbe submitted at anytime until that <br />date.. Under a very tight schedule it may be possible that the expiration date for such a petition <br />could occur by the September 9, 2008 Council meeting. This would be the last likely date that an <br />alternative bid could be awarded with the expectation that work could be completed in 2008. <br />Staff mentions this since there is some confusion resulting from the interaction between these <br />two projects as is illustrated by the attached email correspondence between one resident and <br />staff. <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br /> <br />It is the recommendation of staffthat itbe directed to prepare a feasibility study for the proposed <br />Andrie Street and l64th Lane street improvements. Staff would also request that the financing <br />aspect for this feasibility study be placed on a future work session agenda. <br /> <br />Action: <br /> <br />Motion to direct staffto prepare a feasibility study for street improvements to Audrie Street and <br />164th Lane and that the financing aspect for this feasibility study be placed on a future work <br />session agenda. <br /> <br />Reviewed by: <br /> <br />Director of Public WorkslPrincipal City Engineer <br />Public Works Street Supervisor <br />City Attorney .. . J.... /1 <br />City Clerk ~ <br />. City Administrator 1<6 . ... · · <br /> <br />cc: OS/27/08 <br /> <br />-92- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.