My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 06/05/2008
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2008
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 06/05/2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 9:45:13 AM
Creation date
5/30/2008 2:29:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
06/05/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
156
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />./' <br />~'"'\ <br />Case # -...) <br /> <br />Discussion Item <br />ADDRESSING ELECTRONIC SIGNS WITH THE SIGN ORDINANCE: <br />CASE OF CITY OF RAMSEY <br />By: Breanne DaInes, Associate Planner <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />As part of the series of changes to be made to bring the City's sign ordinance up to date, staff has <br />. been conducting research with regard to the regulation of electronic signs. These signs have <br />many different names, but generally refer to signs with electronic or dynamic messages that <br />automatically change. Oftentimes these signs utilize LED light technology. The popularity of <br />these signs stems from the ability to easily show many advertisements within a short time period. <br />Also, these advertisements can be catered to. time-of-day (ie. showing breakfast and coffee . <br />advertisements in the morning). The impetus for. the regulation of these signs is that there is a <br />potential for these signs to be distracting to drivers and can compromise the aesthetics of the <br />surrounding environment. While staff recognizes the importance of emerging technologies in the <br />ability to adequately advertise both on-premise and off-premise businesses, it is also important to <br />consider the negative effects of these signs, and provide regulations to mitigate these factors. <br /> <br />The following items are included in your packet, for your information: <br /> <br />1) City of Minnetonka Sign Ordinance <br />2) Research on brightness standards and. driver distraction, SRF Consulting, 6.7.07 <br /> <br />Observations: <br /> <br />In conducting a literature review of a variety of Minnesota and Wisconsin sign ordinances, staff <br />has prepared a list of possible standards to apply to electronic signs within the City. Each option <br />is listed least restrictive to most restrictive. <br /> <br />Definition of Electronic Sign: <br /> <br />. Many cities do not differentiate between electronic signs and other types of static signs. <br />. Sollie cities use the definition of "changeable copy signs" to include static and electronic <br />signs. The regulations for all changeable copy signs are the same. An example definition <br />would be "a sign such as a manual, electronic, or electric controlled time and temperature <br />signs, message center, or readerboard, whether electronic, electric or manual, where copy <br />changes. Any sign may be, or include as part of it, a changeable message sign." <br />(Middleton Sign Ordinance) <br />. Many cities in Wisconsin use the definition of "Electronic Message Center" to address <br />electronic signs. An example definition is "A permanent sign whose informational <br />content can be Changed or altered by electronic means." <br />. Minnetonka was recently in a lawsuit with billboard O\Vl1ers. The city's attorneys wrote <br />an ordinance that defmes all electronic signs as "dynamic display." The few cities that <br />have updated their sign ordinances in Minnesota recently have used this definition <br /> <br />45 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.