My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Environmental Policy Board - 06/02/2008
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Environmental Policy Board
>
2008
>
Minutes - Environmental Policy Board - 06/02/2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 2:26:44 PM
Creation date
6/20/2008 1:59:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Environmental Policy Board
Document Date
06/02/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Board Member Bentz stated that if they were to make butterfly gardens or attract hummingbirds <br />to the park, it would be something that the public would be able to participate in and go back to <br />visit. <br /> <br />Environmental Coordinator Anderson advised that those projects would fit in with the idea of <br />habitat restoration and could also be considered for a project. He stated that the best thing <br />tonight might be to get the discussion going and not. settle on anyone thing. He explained that <br />Chairperson McDilda had asked him to add this item to the agenda so that they could discuss <br />what could be done still this year or in future years by the EPB. He stated that they could keep <br />this item on the agenda for the meeting next month where they could continue the discussion <br />with full attendance. <br /> <br />Board Member Stodola stated that if the Board were to come up with an ongoing project to <br />participate in he would be more than willing to donate his monthly stipend towards the project. <br />He explained that he did not join the EPB for the monthly stipend and would be happy to donate <br />the money to a project. <br /> <br />Environmental Coordinator Anderson advised that was very generous and would always be an <br />option. .He stated that he would double check with someone in the Finance Department to make <br />sure that could continue to be done and was not just a one-time thing. He explained that <br />although the monthly stipend is not a lot of money, it does take time and gasoline for the Board <br />Members to get to the meetings every month. He stated that the last thing that he would want is <br />for any of the Board Members to feel pressured into giving up their monthly stipend for a <br />project. He advised that he does have a small amount of funding available for use on a <br />reasonable project. He stated that they could discuss donating the monthly stipends as a Board <br />but advised that the discussion would need to be revisited anytime a new Board Member joined <br />the EPB. He again advised that he would not want anyone to feel pressured to donate his or her <br />stipend, as there would be possible funding available through the City. <br /> <br />Acting Chairperson Sibilski questioned if there were any park lands that were not quite <br />developed that may be suitable for restoration. <br /> <br />Environmental Coordinator Anderson advised that there are parcels that are currently owned by <br />the City but that are not dedicated park land, one of them being about 20 or 30 acres in the Trott <br />Brook Corridor; He advised that he did not really know the status of that land but thought that it <br />could be looked at for restoration. He advised that there might be another area south of the <br />landfill that the DNR and the MPCA have been considering as an ideal location for an oak <br />savannah restoration project. He explained that land might be something that the City ultimately <br />acquires and then would be something that the Board could get in on, but advised that would be a <br />year or two down the road. <br /> <br />Acting Chairperson Sibilski thought something like that would be a good project for the Board to <br />get involved in, and suggested the area to the west of Alpine Park for restoration work. He <br />advised that they would need to do a prescribed burn in that area. <br /> <br />Environmental Coordinator Anderson advised that a prescribed burn would need authorization <br />from the Fire Chief. He stated that for habitat restoration, they would also need signage that <br />stated habitat restoration in process, explained the process, and included the plants that they were <br />working with in the project. <br />Environmental Policy Board / June 2, 2008 <br />Page 7 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.