My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 06/24/2008
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2008
>
Agenda - Council - 06/24/2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 9:22:24 AM
Creation date
6/20/2008 2:14:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
06/24/2008
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
364
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Management Intern Gladhill indicated two driveways are allowed on this property in this zoning. <br />district. <br /> <br />Management Intern Gladhill indicated there did not need to be a firewall required at this time. <br /> <br />Vice Chairperson Levine stated he went and looked at the parcel and he did not think the existing <br />shed was visible or offensive. He stated he was not in favor of removing the shed in order to <br />build the proposed structure. <br /> <br /> <br />Commissioner Rogers agreed. <br /> <br />Commissioner Van Scoy stated his concern wa <br />space and they are still looking at a CUP. He <br />sort of guidelines that work because they are co <br />Burrell ifheneeded a fifty-foot shed. <br /> <br />expanded the storage <br />with some <br />asked Mr. <br /> <br />:Mr. Burrell stated he would like to have enough r <br />boat and to also store his tools and a Model A. He stated he <br />and keep everything under cover for securi~ <br /> <br />Commissioner Brauer indicated the re <br />not unusual to what other people have <br />if it is really too tight the way it is. <br /> <br />was because the items listed are <br />hen they get to the ordinance <br /> <br />Associate Planner DaInes stat <br />This is the second request si <br /> <br />or an overage in almost two years. <br />tage in 2006. <br /> <br />ilding seemed so excessive and having it sitting right in <br />er even if it seems appropriate. She wondered if they <br />the area with having all of the. accessory buildings <br /> <br />that taking anything off the back would do anything visually <br />sue. <br /> <br />in compliance right now the way it is and he did not see a <br /> <br />Commissioner <br />back from the ham <br /> <br />d if this building were pushed back a little. further so it is scaled <br />not be so overbearing. <br /> <br />Associate Planner DaInes indicated this could be a condition of the CUP, <br /> <br />Commissioner Rogers wondered why the existing shed was placed so far back on the lot. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/June 5, 2008 <br />Page 4 of 12 <br /> <br />-210- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.