Laserfiche WebLink
Sharon WatSOn, !representing Danny's Aluminum Processing, Inc., stated that Mr. Karst's <br />proposal for !ag mended CUP and new site plan is to address issues raised earlier. Aesthetics is a <br />big issue and the goal is to put as much as possible into the building. The new building would be <br />13,000 feet. ~He iiproposing to construct more effective screening such as a 10 foot fence made of <br />metal or woo& She added they have attempted to address the environmental issues. In the present <br />building, thor~ is ~ floor drain for waste oil and there is one proposed for the new building also. <br />The smoke re~ortSwere made out of ignorance; when material is taken out of the furnace it is hot, <br />therefore, sm0,ke arises from the material. Twin City Testing has done tests on the smoke stacks <br />and there is n.~ problem with the emissions. Application has been made to the Pollution Control <br />Agency regaling the initial afterburner; however, PCA has had a turnover in staff and the <br />application Ms been misplaced. One of their staff is now walking the process through for the <br />permit and on&e that is processed, an afterburner will be put on the second unit. <br /> <br />Mr. Karst di~/seminated a question and answer sheet that addressed issues raised about his <br />business. ~ <br /> <br />Following disCusSion of these issues, Commissioner Deemer inquired if there were any violations <br />to Mr. Karst'~s~preSent conditional use permit. <br /> <br />Mr. Karst st~d there were and explained the confusion. He understood that what his competition <br />was allowed! t~b do, he also was allowed to do. If that were the case, he would not be in violation <br />of his CUP. <br /> <br />Commissione/~ Deemer felt that as long as Mr. Karst had violated his existing CUP, he didn't want <br />to consider rec~ mmending an amended one. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Deemer to table this case until Mr. Karst is in compliance with his <br />existing CUP.r. <br /> <br />Motion died for l~k of a second. <br /> <br />The Commission proceeded to review the findings of fact. <br /> <br />Motion by Cqmmissioner Deemer and seconded by Commissioner Terry to amend #12 to read <br />"That the Applici~nt has submitted revised documentation dated August 26, 1992, drawn by <br />Hakanson Alu,il. ers0n Associates, Inc. consisting of a four (4) sheet set including boundary survey, <br />site plan, grading plan, landscape plan, and a two (2) sheet set of architectural drawings..." <br />Motion carridd. Voting Yes: Chairperson Bawden, Commissioner Deemer, Terry, Holland, <br />LaDue and ThOm& Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner Hendriksen. <br /> <br />~otion by Copamissioner Terry and seconded by Commissioner Deemer to add a finding to read <br />'The City of~ltarn~.~ ey has defined that when a site receives discarded materials and processes these <br />materials into ~m and product with value, then it's considered manufacturing. When a site receives <br />discarded maWrials for collection and recycles them at another site, it's considered a solid waste <br />management fa- cility". <br /> <br />Motion carridd. Voting Yes: Chairperson Bawden, Commissioners Terry, Deemer, Holland, <br />LaDue and Thom& Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner Hendriksen. <br /> <br />Motion by COmmissioner Holland and seconded by Commissioner Terry to amend #26 to read <br />"That the proLSose~d use will not substantially adversely impair the use, enjoyment or market value <br />of any surrounding property". <br /> <br />Planning and Zoning Commission/September 1, 1992 <br /> Page 5 of 10 <br /> <br /> <br />