Laserfiche WebLink
Further d~scus~om Commissioner Deemer expressed concern about the complaints that have been <br />received regar~ding Danny's Aluminum Processing, Inc. <br />Motion carrY. Voting Yes: Chairperson Bawden, Commissioners Holland, Terry, Deemer, <br />LaDue and .'~orud. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner Hendriksen. <br /> <br />Motion by ;Co~n, rai~ ssioner Holland and seconded by Commissioner Terry to amend #27 to read <br />"That the pr0~selt use will be harmonious with and in accordance with any specific objectives of <br />the Compretle0siv~¢ Plan." <br /> <br />Motion carri~e41. ¥oting Yes: Chairperson Bawden, Commissioners Holland, Terry, Deemer, <br />LaDue and "lYhbru~l. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner Hendriksen. <br /> <br />Motion by Co~n~ssioner Deemer and seconded by Commissioner Terry to add a finding to read <br />"That curre~tiop~rating conditions are not in compliance with the conditional use permit in <br />existence". <br /> <br />Further d~scuslnon: Commissioner Terry stated that since no charges or complaints have been filed <br />by Staff aga~,~t Mr... Karst, maybe he is not in violation of his existing CUP. Mr. Schroeder stated <br />that the prop0$al ~ is presented gives rise to the belief it is an improvement. <br /> <br />Motion carrier!. ~Voting Yes: Chairperson Bawden, Commissioners Deemer, Terry, Holland, <br />LaDue and T ,ISorud. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner Hendriksen. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Holland and seconded by Commissioner LaDue to amend #28 to read <br />"That the p~'o~osed use will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained so as to be <br />harmonious agd ~ppropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general <br />vicinity and ~11 not change the essential character of the area. <br /> <br />Motion carrie, gl. Voting Yes: Chairperson Bawden, Commissioners Holland, LaDue, Deemer, <br />Terry and ThOfud! Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner Hendriksen.; <br />Motion by t2dlmrmss~oner Thorud and seconded by Commissioner Holland to delete #29 which <br />reads "That th{ pr~}posed use will'/will not be an improvement to property in the immediate vicinity <br />and to the commut~ity as a whole". <br /> <br />Motion carrie4t. Voting Yes: Chairperson Bawden, Commissioner Thorud, Holland, Deemer, <br />LaDue and Teh'y.[ Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner Hendriksen. <br /> <br />Motion by C~m~issioner Terry and seconded by Commissioner Deemer to amend #20 to read <br />"That the pr01~osed use will create additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and <br />services." <br /> <br />Further dmcusl~on: Ms. Frolik asked for clarification on "will create additional requirements...". <br />Commissionl~ Tei~ry stated it pertains to the Police Officers going out on calls about the processing <br />plant. Ms. ~lik :~nquired if he felt another officer would have to be put on duty and if not will it <br />really create ar!d~ ittonal requirements at public cost? <br /> [ : <br /> <br />Motion failed.i VOting Yes: Commissioners Deemer, LaDue and Terry. Voting No: Chairperson <br />Bawden, Co ,m~nis,~ioners Holland and Thorud. Absent: Commissioner Hendriksen. <br /> <br />Motion by Go~nmjssioner Thorud and seconded by Commissioner Holland to amend #30 to read <br />"That the pr?~oseXl use will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public <br />facilities and~ ~ervices". <br /> l~lanning and Zoning Commission/September 1, 1992 <br /> Page 6 of 10 <br /> <br /> <br />