My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 07/10/2008
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2008
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 07/10/2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 9:45:19 AM
Creation date
6/27/2008 1:27:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
07/10/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
122
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Case # ~ <br /> <br />Public Hearing <br />DISCUSS ORDINANCE TO AMEND SECTION 9.12 (SIGNS) OF CITY CODE TO <br />INCORPORATE "DYNAMIC DISPLAY" SIGN REGULATIONS: <br />CASE OF THE CITY OF RAMSEY <br />By: Breanne DaInes, Associate Planner <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />As part of the series of changes to be made to bring the City's sign ordinance up to date, staff has <br />been conducting research with regard to the regulation .of electronic signs. These signs have <br />many different names, but generally refer to signs with electronic or dynamic messages that <br />automatically change. The impetus for the regulation of these signs is that there is a potential for <br />these signs to be distracting to drivers and can compromise the aesthetics of the surrounding <br />environment. While staff recognizes the impOl:tance of emerging technologies in the ability to <br />adequately advertise both on-premise and off-premise businesses, it is also important to consider <br />the negative effects ofthese signs, and provide regulations to mitigate these factors. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission met on June 5, 2008, and discussed options for amending the sign <br />ordinance. The Planning Commission di!ected staff to use the City of Minnetonka's sign <br />ordinance as a basis for revisions, and to research Ramsey businesses' use of timing on existing <br />electronic signs. The proposed ordinance is included in your packet. <br /> <br />Observations: <br /> <br />Definition of Electronic Sign: <br />The proposed ordinance includes a defInition for "dynamic display" which is defIned below. <br />This defInition is almost identical to Minnetonka's ordinance. <br /> <br />Dynamic Display- Any characteristic of a sign that appears to have movement or that <br />appears to change, caused by any method other than physically removing and replacing <br />the sign or its components, whether the apparent movement of change is in the display, the <br />sign. structure itself, or any other component of the sign. This includes a display that <br />incorporates a technology or method allowing the sign face to change the image without <br />having to physically or mechanically replace the sign face or its components. This also <br />includes any rotating, revolving, moving, flashing, blinking, or animated display and any <br />display that incofporatesrotating panels, LED lights manipulated through digital input or <br />any other method of technology that allows the sign face to present a series of images or <br />displays. <br /> <br />Brightness: <br />The proposed ordinance states that no sign may be of such intensity of brilliance that it interferes <br />with the effectiveness of an official traffic sign, device or signal, or that distracts a motor vehicle <br />driver. - <br /> <br />~ Size: <br />The proposed ordinance limits dynamic display to 35 percent of total allowable signage (which <br />would typically equal 35 square feet in commercial/industrial districts). <br /> <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.