Laserfiche WebLink
d. FuII animation and video. <br />3. If one of the farms of static display is identified as the preferred operational mode; a <br />minimum display time should be established. This display time should correspond to the <br />operation roadway speed (rather than posted speed limit}, allo«~ing at most' one image <br />transition during the time that the sign if visible to a driver traveling at the operational <br />speed. <br />If a shorter minimum display time is considered; the effects of message sequencing <br />• should be considered. ~jJait intervals of more than 1-2 seconds between sequenced <br />messages have the potential to become more of a distraction as viewers «~ait impatiently <br />for the next screen; in an effort to view the complete message. <br />4. If the community wishes to accommodate aination or video in some or all locations <br />where dynamic are permitted, a minimum and maximum duration of a video image <br />should be established. The, purpose for establishing a time limit is to ensure that the <br />message. is conveyed in a short, concise time frame that does not cause slowing of traffic <br />to allow drivers to see the entire message. Given the creativity of advertising; these video <br />images may be seen as a form of entertainment, and people typically like to see an <br />entertaining message through to the end. <br />Differentiate between zoning districts where dynamic signs are permitted by right, and <br />zoning districts, overlay districts; or special districts where they should only be allowed <br />through the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. A CUP would involve public <br />notification and revie«~ and approval by the P1amling Commission. Other options would <br />include a design review board or other dispute resolution process. <br />5. Consider the establishment of minimum distance requirements betti~,~een electronic <br />outdoor advertising devices in relation to the zoning district or roadway context in which <br />the signs are allowed. <br />6. Consider size limitations on dynamic signs for zoning districts where they are allo«~ed. <br />This may vary from one district to another. <br />7. Consider if dynamic signs are allo«~ed independently; or if they must be incorporated into <br />the body of another sign, and therefore become a limited percentage of the overall sign <br />face. <br />Establish a requirement for that all dynamic signs that emit light be equipped «~ith <br />mechanisms that allow brightness to be set at specific nit levels and. respond accurately to <br />chariging light conditions. The City must establish the authority to disable or turn the <br />device off if it malfunctions in a maimer that creates excessive glare or intensity that <br />causes visual interference or blind. spots; and require that the device remain inoperable <br />until such time that the owner demonstrates to the appropriate city official that the device <br />is in satisfactory working condition. If such technology is not available: consideration <br />should be give to bamiing dynamic signs that emit light until such time as the technology <br />allows brightness levels to be precisely controlled. <br />x,30 <br />-238- <br />