Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Site Plan Review.: Panther Precision <br />August 1, 2008 <br />Page 3 of4 <br /> <br />You have met with various City staff regarding the opportunity to locate some of the planting <br />requirements on the adjacent city-owned lot containing the regional stormwater pond. City <br />staff will continue to work with you to explore this opportunity. Please submit a revised site <br />plan that indicates your proposal to locate the additional plantings necessary to satisfy City <br />Code requirements. <br /> <br />Irrigation: All new landscaping shall be irrigated by an in-gro:und system. Irrigation <br />metering and backflow devices shall be approved as part of the Utility Plan, and installed <br />accordingly. Irrigation rain sensors shall be installed and appropriately placed throughout the <br />site. Notes must be added to the plans and information provided to insure compliance with <br />these requirements. <br /> <br />Tree Preservation: There are no significant trees requiring preservation, thus,. no tree <br />preservation plan is necessary. <br /> <br />prainage and Grading: A grading, drainage, and erosion cqntrol has been prepared for this <br />proposed facility byBakanson Anderson, Inc. dated July 3, 2008. The following items must <br />be revised with the building permit submittal: _ <br />. Please proyide information on where the existing catch basin at the southerly shared <br />access drains to. <br />. The storm sewer at the proposed access to Sunwood Drive should separate the existing <br />system from the proposed design. The associated drainage and utility easem~nt shown <br />on the proposed plat should also reflect this revision. <br />. The proposed pipe run from CBJvIH-2 tothe FES in the pond must be RCP, nbt the <br />CPP proposed. <br />. Please provide spot elevations on the existing curbline for the.property to the south, <br />and around the monhoringwell in the northwest comer of the proposed site. <br />. Reach 900 on the drainage calculations shows 8.04 cfs commg in but only 2.46 cfs <br />coming out;.please clarify what subcatchment and reach 900 are. <br />. All FES's must have an invert withinone foot of the pond bottom, and trash guards <br />must be included. The existing FES' s on the east side of the pond should be reviewed <br />to investigate this requirement as well. <br />. Notes should be included to show erosion control blanket on the pond slopes, and the <br />proposed seed mix should include ... the appropriate fertilizer. application. rate (if <br />applicable). <br />. The detail proposed for the inlet control device should be deleted and notes added for <br />the installation of Wimco's or approved equal. Locations for each should be clearly <br />marked on the plans as well. <br />. A note must be added to the utility plan specifying the use of class 53 pipe for all <br />ductile iron watermain 6~' in diameter and smaller. <br /> <br />Loading Docks: City Code requires one loading dock for the first 10,000 square feet of floor <br />space and one loading dock for every additional 25,000 square feet of floor space. The <br /> <br />18 <br />