Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Sketch Plan Review: Michels Property <br />August 29, 2008 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />indicates a desire to vacate that road easement. .A.ltho1,1.gh this easement is no longer <br />needed for roa.d access to Khtg' s Island in the city of Anoka, this parcel is part of the <br />larger Mississippi River Regional Trail Corridor which is planned toru.ll through King's <br />Island. Staff f!:cor:p.mends you work with your engineel:/surveyor to propose a trail <br />alignment that accesses King's Island while rni.ni.:mizing tree loss. Staff will review this . <br />proposal as part oillie Final Plat stage. . <br /> <br />.5. Density:. TI'l.e subject property is approximately 5.08 acres in size. E,.l. Employment <br />allows up to 45% building coverage on a lot. The sketch plan identifies one (1) unit on <br />Lot 1. This meets City Code standards for the E-l District. <br /> <br />. . <br /> <br />6. Streets: No new streets arebeing planned as part of the ~ubdivision. There is an existing <br />easement that is .proposed to be vacated with the plat. The City will not .vacate the <br />easement until the new trail easement is dedicated. Trail easements cannot be dedicated <br />with the plat; a separate, recordable document is required. It is noted that in the future if <br />Outlot A is to. be developed, additional access will need to be secured separate. from <br />Rivlyn Avenue. <br /> <br />. 7. Setbacks: The .E~1 District requires the following structure setbacks: 35 foot front yard <br />setback, 20 foot side yard setback,. and 35 foot rear y:ud setback. Compliance with the <br />e~tabli~hed setbacks is verif1edon the Sketch Pllm for Loot 1. <br /> <br />g, Qn\ding a:t1d Draill~ge: The Mississippi River Overlay Di.strict regulations state that it <br />n'l.ust be shown that the proposed development will not increase the runoff ra:te or <br />decrease the natural.rate oJ absorption of storm wate]," when Outlot A is. developed. . <br />Development shall beconsisterrt with the City's Surface' Water Managem~nt Plan or <br />engin~ering methods approved by the City. <br /> <br />9. Traffic Generation Analvsis: . City Code requires a traffic generation an~ysis with Final <br />Plat review. Standard procedures require that the City hire a traffic consultant to review <br />the traffic patterns and traffic impact of the development. Staff notes that if a proposal <br />for development comes forward for Outlot A, additional access in addition to R,iverdale <br />Drive will need to be considered. <br /> <br />10. Utilities and Wate!' u.sage j No additional utility co~ections are being proposed. The. <br />seoondaJ.')' septic area for tl'le industrial lot includes the existing gravel drive. The size of <br />the undisturbed ~rea should be field verified 1110. cqmparedagaiIult the arearequir~d by <br />code. The secondary area tn'ust be protected from trafflc or disturbance. If the av~lable' <br />area is not sufficient the plat boundaries should be adj1J.sted to provide the necessary area. <br />Outlot A is adjacel'lt to City S~rvic.es and it is anticipated conneotion will b@ required <br />when Outlot A is developed. <br /> <br />11. Park 1;)edication: TIle new Lot 1 replaces the existirig lot of record and park dedication <br />will not bel.'equixed. Payment o:fParkDedication Fees will be collected i;t:.ap application <br />:for subdivision is submitted for Outlot A. The rate at the time of development will be <br /> <br />8 <br />