My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council Work Session - 10/07/2008
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council Work Session
>
2008
>
Agenda - Council Work Session - 10/07/2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 9:35:46 AM
Creation date
10/3/2008 1:09:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
10/07/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
155
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />'-/ <br />------ <br /> <br />City Council Work Session <br />Topic Report: Recap of Community Center Focus GrQups <br />By: Tim Gladhill <br /> <br />City of J{- <br />~~/" <br />RAMSEY <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />Staff has completed the scheduled Community Center Focus Groups. The following is a summary of <br />those results as well as discussion of what possible next steps may be. <br /> <br />The following items are enclosed for your information: <br /> <br />a) Community Center Focus Group results <br />b) Responses received outside of focus groups <br /> <br />Observations: <br /> <br />The Community Center Focus Groups focused on fmlr major areas (facHities, ,services, financing, and <br />other community priorities). The Focus Groups resulted in a wide range of respol1ses and served as an <br />opportunity to provide some b~lckgl'ound' on the potential of construction a community center in the City <br />of Ramsey. <br /> <br />, After the brainstorming session, attendees were asked to rank their priorities using Hdot voth,g". <br />Attendees ranked their top three priorities .in each category. First priorities were worth three points, <br />second priorities were worth two points, and third priorities were worth one point. The results. of this <br />ranking is reflected in the attached results. <br /> <br />facilities <br /> <br />Although the range of responses was broad, several facilities surfaced as a priority for a project <br />such as this. These priority facilities included a fitness component, indoor walking tracks <br />(especially for winter months), a community pool/water park (both indoor and outdoor), skate <br />park and conference center. It appears that it was important to attendees to have facilities and <br />services for people of all ages. <br /> <br />Other facilities listed include tennis courts, dog parks, theater/auditorium facilities, ice arena, <br />climbing walls, and handball courts. Attached to this case is a letter from the Anoka Community <br />Concert Association (AeCA) expressing a need for s\lch facilities in order for them to continue <br />their program. There also exists an opportunity to provide a space for a senio.r center. Currently, <br />our local seniors group meets at Fire Station #1. <br /> <br />S~rvtce~ <br /> <br />A major priority of services for potential users included some sort of community education <br />program that could reach beyond the walls of a community center. ~ome suggested having some <br />sort of rental program for bikes and other athletic equipment, canoes, etc. <br /> <br />Other high priorities included child care services and cafe/food services. It was also suggested <br />that this food service could also serve a conference center. <br /> <br />...:45... <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.