Agenda - Council - 10/24/2000 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

· three antennas). · Co-location radius was increased from tA mite to one mile. Citizen Input There was none. Increasing the tower height in residential zones from 75 to 120 feet (desig-ned for at_l~ast Motion by Co~issioner Wivod~ seconded by Co~issioner ~. m~ey, he~g. Motion C~ed. Voting Yes: Vice-Cha~erson Kocisc~)2C'~iss[oners Wivoda, Gfiffiths, ~d Reeve. Voting No: None. ~e public he~g closed at 8:48 p.m. Com~ssion BusMess Vice-Chai,erson Kociscak called t~efe~ meeting of the Pl~ng &~Z~sf;n back to order Commissioner Wivoda stateG/that Se~on 9.15.08":Subd~gision"_c addresses the setback requirements whSch is already addresseg'~ sectio_n/ff/}c~.03 a~-.qfl~tioned if ir is necessary in Co~u~ty Devdlopm~t. Director Frolik re~H~d ~at it should be removed ~om section 9.1.5.03 Co~issi0h~'Wivoda state~':hat it is relative on for TV towers and amateur towers to be ag~.tfie house ~d qu&~bned ifaey w~[:{~'~;exclude ~at ~pe of use. Co~ission[~:"~aeve, ~'~4'~'"that i~[~e-~btb~k requirement is 1.5 times the height of ~e tower, · en a W ~te~'a or mateur radio ante~a would not fit on a residential prope~ ~at has a Co~um~Development ~tor Frolik noted ~at private W ante~as and amateur towers are exempt ~om ~at setback.~irement. She inquired if ~e proposed setback requkement should be ~om neighS&ng homY'or the house on the prope~. Co~issionerWivoda replied ~at he felt the setback should be ~om nei~bofing homes. ;~ice-Cha~B~n Kociscak inquired if there should be a minimum setback reqmrement for the home on. the prope~. -192- Planning Commission/October 3, 2000 Page 12 of 16 I I I I I I I. I I I i I I I I I I