Agenda - Council - 10/24/2000 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

I I I I I i I I I I I Consensus of the Commission was that the setback requirements would be applicable homes on adjacent properties; the distance between the tower and the home On decision of the property owner leasing space to the tower company. The Commission discussed at length the height of a tower and what height three co-locators. ~odate Consensus oft he Commission was to stay with the 120 foot height Commissioner Wivoda stated that section 9.15.17 addresses 50 feet, but a typical height is 50 feet. He suggested chant than 60 feet. antennas less than wordin~g to be anything less Consensus of the Commission was to change the feet in height". "less than 60 Motion by Commissioner Wivoda, seconded by Commissioner to recommend that City Council amend the tower regulat!;0,.ns aS proposed. . Motion Carried. Voting Yes: ¥ifi~¢Chai~so~,'Kociscak, Comm/s:i ~ Dempsey, Griffiths, and Reeve. Voting N~i;N:'0h~}5~, "~",:5: ~fi¢~' Case ~7: Request for Site Plan Remew of C~nerete MaSon~ Un,ted Inc.; Case of Co~uniW Deva4b~ent~Assistant Wald st'~'~ that in March of ~998, ~e applicant apptiea for a conditional: u*Se'~emit to :~blish a w~eho~g~[}gili~ ~ a B-1 Business disMct. ~e CiW Counml approved the condt~0nal use pe~t Co~agent upon s~te pl~ approval. ~e CzW of Ramsey:ha';received a re~Ua~for site plan re~4~'~om Concrete M~o~ U~i~ted, Inc. ne Site pI~ '{s PrOPosing to, C6~'~cta 6,642 sO~:~ foot office and wareho)se faciliW. ~e area is generally loc~:n9~',¢~'S:~i~:~¢~¢?'0 and Boile~ers on '15o~ Avenue. %e site is zoned B-1 Busifiess;..~0ffice hcilities are a peri,ed use. Warehousing hcilities ~e not a 75~:~'.57~e~ use in a B:~I~BminesW'district. ~e applic~t properly applied for a conditional use ..~??:'~i{.-~&.~ CiW Cou%~?~¢p[~,, approval to ~e w~ehouse portion of ~e operation. ~e proposed building include~:.~office ~ea of 1,362 squ~e feet ~d a 5,280 squ~e foot w~ehouse ~ea. The s~m:aure meetstk~t~'ack requirements ~d is in compliance wi~ the 35% iot coverage ~e building is proposed to consist of concrete maso~ block, some maintenance ~ee siding and ~ ~phalt shingla roof. ~e proposed sid~g deviates from the Business arc~tbcmraI standards .and will neeG Ci~ Council approval. ~e applic~t has stated to staff that he intends to construct ~:: a':building ~a~'contains only concrete m~o~ units instead of concrete and vinyl siding. Staff rec~mm~ded that the concrete block be inte~ally treated With color instead of pa~ted concrete. A re~2ed exterior elevation plan will need to be submi2ed to staff prior to CiW Council aPProVal. ~e applicant is requesting ~at the back potion of ~e parcel remain in its natural Planning Commission/October 3, 2000 Page 13 of 16 -193-