My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 10/24/2000
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2000
>
Agenda - Council - 10/24/2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 1:48:10 PM
Creation date
7/28/2003 2:38:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
10/24/2000
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
283
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
uncomfortable with the way Subdivision 2.C.f. was written. He felt that' there shOuld <br />criteria that is applicable and not interpreted on a case by cases basis. Mr. <br />suggested that Mr. Gordon clarify the tiering recommendation made by <br />Hendriksen. <br /> <br />Hoisington Koegler Consultant Gordon reviewed some examples as to <br />impact certain parcels in the City. <br /> <br />Commissioner Dempsey stated that-Subdivision 1 should b~ ~..e~ urban <br />development adjacent to existing urban development. ~ '~ <br /> <br />Community Development Director Frohk noted a letter tla~.~as from Mr. Ben Deemer <br />requesting that property that is currently zoned for be exempted from <br />density transition requirements. <br /> <br />Vice-Chairperson Kociscak stated that he would be uncomfort~ <br />to the Council without Chairperson Nixt being ~ven an. o <br />draft. <br /> <br />.g the ordinance on <br /> most recent <br /> <br /> Consensus of the Commission <br /> <br /> Case #6: Proposed Amendment~t~iTower <br /> <br /> Vice-Chairperson Kociscak closed the of Co~ssion meeting at <br /> 8:44 p.m. in order to conduct the public <br /> <br /> Public Hear~gz'' <br /> Vice-Ch~;rson Kocisc~;~ed ~e ~ back to order at 8:~ p.m. <br /> <br /> :%~esa. Greenfield,:¥:McCombg', Fr~ Roos, ~d Associates, stated that at ~e regulm <br /> Co~lsS!On meeting m' Septemb~, some defimtive d~ectmn w~ ~ven for ~end~ng ~e Tower <br /> Or&nance. h. su~a~, th? pCposed amendmenU consist of the following: <br /> <br /> · Resthcting;;~'{ell to we~ to residential p~cels at least 10 acres ~ size located ~ an area <br /> depicted i~'the dra~ comprehensive pl~ as the Rural Prese~e ~ea (to be identified as a <br /> Tower Oveflay Dis~ct in the tower ordnance). <br />'"'~;~.~': · Resthcting all other towers in the residential zone generally to church, park, gove~ent, <br /> ~:. school.,.Utffi% and institutional sites at least 10 acres in size. <br /> · .': Establishing a tower setback ~om residential dwellings equal to 1.5 times ~e height of the <br /> tow~. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/October 3, 2000 <br /> Page 11 of 16 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.