Agenda - Council - 10/24/2000 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

· Increasing the tower height in residential zones from 75 to 120 feet (desi~oned for a~:71ea~ three antermas). · Co-Iocation radius was increased from ½ mile to one mile. Citizen Input Motion by Co~issioner Wivoda, seconded by Co~issioner,,~}~y, to'~l;se ~e Motion Ca~ed. Vot~g Yes: Vice-Chaicerson Kocisc~}:..'C:~ssioners Wivoda, Dempsey, '~:~ Gfiffiths, ~d Reeve. Vot~g No: None. The public hearing closed at 8:48 p.m. Commission Business ' · Vice-Chairperson Kociscak called the ~l~:meeting of the Planning C;:~i~n back to order Co~issioner Wivoda state'd~-;~at S;e~on 9:15.0~;:~;~B~Gsio~Sc addresses the setback requirements which is already addresse~::~ section:?~'~.0~ ~'g:~;~tioned if it is necessa, in both places. '~, Co~uni~ DeVdi¢¢~[~ector FroI~ rep!~e~ that it should be removed from section 9.15.03. Co~issiOh~':~ivoda stat~)~at it is relativ~~on for TV towers ~d mateur towers to be ag~he house ~d qu~ned if ~ey w~[~:Sxclude ~at ~pe of use. co~issione~:;R&eve~smtea ~h~t:i~'~}55¢~3k requirement is 1.5 times the height of the tower, then a ~ ~te~'~:~mateur radio ante~a would not fit on a residential prope~ mat h~ a Co~uni:QDevelopmen~-~;~r Frolik noted that private TV ante=as and amateur towers are exempt ffom.'~at setbackm(~irement. She inquired if the proposed setback requbement should be from neighbo~ng hom~s:or the house on the prope~. Co~issioner ~voda replied ~at he felt the setback should be from neighboring homes. ~: ::~ice-Cha~on Kociscak inquired if ~ere should be a minimum setback requirement for the ~me on ~e'prope~. -22- Planning Commission/October 3, 2000 Page 12 of 16 I I ',1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I