Laserfiche WebLink
state. No outside storage of any kind is permitted unless the storage yard is paved and <br /> Outside storage also requires screening, The site plan indicates that a fence will screen any <br /> outside storage. The applicant needs to submit a revised plan that indicates how ra2:¢h*/'square <br /> footage will be used for outside storage on the property and specify what type oSfenci~g will be <br /> used for screening purposes. Staff rec°mmended that the landscape plan be <br /> four additional trees in the proposed green space area to the northwest an4 ~b~"additi0hi~'?2ees <br /> along the west/southwest property line. The site plan is absent of an ext~:~ighting plafi'iand <br /> upon submittal, will require approval by the City Engineer. The facili~ wili'be'served by <br /> sewer and Water facilities. :, !~i' ~!~?~-~.; ~!~'~ <br /> <br /> Brett Pomerleau, stated that the City is requiring that he ¢°~Stmct a poma in the back of his <br /> property which was not indicated in 1998 ,,'-~!5} ? <br /> <br /> Community Development Director Frolik replied th~Ofi;sSteiPon ing is!~-~on standard, but <br /> recommended that Mr. Pomerleau meet with the City Enginee* to rede?the grading and drainage <br /> <br /> Commissioner Dempsey inquired if ~. Pomerleau could have a 4~l~.~:!i:[¢n4.e~f~§' for the City <br /> <br /> Mr. Pomerleau replied yes. ? fi?:"i:'"'i"!;*~',~ .... <br /> <br /> Commissioner Dempsey suggested leav~ng~e co~d!~ns as state~ ~h the C~ty staff review letter <br /> and then have Mr. Pomerleau present th~.(:kolor([~e~defing a~7:t~ Council meeting and let the <br /> Council determine ff any exceptions should'¢~(~hde. <br /> <br /> Motion by ~6'~issioner~Dempsey, second~[:[~y..;~mmissioner Wivoda, to recommend that <br /> City Coun~]]~Pprove the pr0~osed site plan f$~i!~'C~'crete Masonry Unlimited Inc., contingent <br /> upon oo i; U: ce with Serf review letter September 29, 2000, <br /> <br /> Gfiffiths, ~d Ree~e:}¢)~Oting No: None. <br /> <br />~:~?:;>~'~'S; ff~}~?:::, Reque;~:~4rSke~h Plan Review of Orchard Hffis; Case of Homestead Multi- <br /> <br /> Co~u~W ~elopmefi~Birector~., Frolik stated that Mike Sc~eider of Homestead Multi- <br /> F~ily Development. has applied for sketch plan review to develop 42 for-sale tow~ome uNts <br /> on prope~ located south of 153~ Avenue NW and Bill's Superette and east of St. Francis Blvd, <br /> ..~ %e p~oPeny consists of approximately 8 acres ~d is cuwently zoned R-3 Urban <br /> :~esidential;~hich allows up to 7 units per acre. The dra~ Comprehensive Plan targets tNs area <br /> forNgh.dehSiW residential uses with densities up to 7 uNts per acre. The developer is proposing <br /> 42 ~B¢::'which equates to a densiW of 5.25 units per acre. %e prQect ~ea abuts two single <br /> f~i~ rural residential lots on the extreme east and a single family urban residential <br /> <br />-24- <br /> <br />Planning Commission/October 3, 2000 <br /> Page 14 of 16 <br /> <br /> <br />