Laserfiche WebLink
<br />make employees aware that there are circumstances where their off-duty conduct effects the <br />City. She noted that even when an employee is off-duty, they could lose credibility as a <br />professional. <br /> <br />Councilmember Dehen asked that, for instance, if someone committed a theft, off-duty, whether <br />the City was able to terminate that employee under our current policy. <br /> <br />Human Resources Manager Kone stated that every situation is going to be different so the details <br />must be looked at and legal counsel consulted to see what level of discipline is warranted. She <br />stated that they do not want to give the impression that everything results in termination. <br /> <br />Councilmember Dehen asked if this policy gives the City more authority to terminate if the <br />Council and Administrator think it affects the job. <br /> <br />City Administrator Ulrich stated that the biggest challenge, as an employer, is to prove the <br />relationship between off duty behavior and their job. He stated that there is a Code of Conduct <br />that attempts to get at that and this would just be more specific and would give a stronger case <br />for any disciplinary action they can take, but it does not necessarily give more authority. <br /> <br />Councilmember Dehen stated that in any type of theft, assuming it is off duty, the seriousness of <br />the theft is defined by how much somebody takes, petty or felony, he still does not understand if <br />City can terminate or if they have to go through a grievance process to terminate. <br /> <br />City Administrator Ulrich stated that the City can take the action, but the question is whether it <br />will be upheld by the courts. He stated that it is true that each individual case is different. He <br />stated that it could be argued that there are certain jobs where this would have more of an impact <br />because of trust levels with the public. <br /> <br />Councilmember Look stated that he sees this as a policy that builds awareness and educates <br />employees. He stated that he thinks it is a good resolution because it sends a good message to <br />the community that the City does hold them to a high level of professionalism because they <br />represent the City. He stated that he feels it is a reasonable amendment. <br /> <br />Councilmember Jeffrey noted that if this amendment is approved, he assumes there will be <br />mandatory training so everyone is aware ofthe new policy. <br /> <br />Human Resources Manager Kone stated that there would be an educational process for staff. <br /> <br />Councilmember Dehen stated that the thing that concerns him is the only tool the City has in <br />findi~g out this information, is ifthese activities are actually occurring in Ramsey. He stated that <br />he does not know if the City has any policies of periodically checking outside of the City to see <br />if any employees are involved in these kinds of actions. He reiterated that if it happens outside <br />of Ramsey, the City would not know about these activities. <br /> <br />City Council October 28,2008 <br />Page 18 of20 <br />